; meta-
> xil...@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.9
>
> On 29-11-17 09:29, Syed Syed wrote:
> > git-...@xilinx.com is internal to Xilinx. You should use g...@xilinx.com.
> > It is still in
> active state. I don’t know why no-one a
-xilinx-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 11:54 AM
To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <manju...@xilinx.com>; Martin
Siegumfeldt <m...@gomspace.com>; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.
@gomspace.com>; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.9
>
> I re-sent the three patches as series to git-...@xilinx.com with a CC to you.
>
> Mike.
>
> On 28-11-17 19:56, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
[mailto:meta-xilinx-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 2:57 AM
To: Martin Siegumfeldt <m...@gomspace.com>; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.9
There are several bugs (at least 3) in the
> To: Martin Siegumfeldt <m...@gomspace.com>; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.9
>
> There are several bugs (at least 3) in the Xilinx tree relating to QSPI, I
> implemented fixes in our tree and sent patches to g...@xilinx
There are several bugs (at least 3) in the Xilinx tree relating to QSPI, I
implemented fixes in our tree and sent patches to g...@xilinx.com (with CC to
several Xilinx people).
I did not receive any feedback so far.
I get the impression that the g...@xilinx.com e-mail is no longer in use.
Hi,
I recently updated the Linux kernel for a custom board based on z7k from Xilinx
version 4.6 to 4.9, and spend a few days debugging issues related to the QSPI
flash (n25q512a13). By coincidence I stumbled upon
