On 07-06-19 04:33, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
Hi all,
On Jun 5, 2019, at 12:11, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
It's your choice. I think the differences are not many (way less than
for the kernel at least).
What are the big pieces from xilinx/u-boot not yet upstreamed?
AFAIK only Dual QSPI. But
Hi all,
> On Jun 5, 2019, at 12:11, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>
> It's your choice. I think the differences are not many (way less than
> for the kernel at least).
>
> What are the big pieces from xilinx/u-boot not yet upstreamed?
>
> AFAIK only Dual QSPI. But git diff is your friend.
>
>> * What
Hi,
On 04/06/19 23:09, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> That is great news!
>
>> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:07, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We plan to release warrior by end of month.
>> We also want to see if we can backport patches of u-boot from Luca to enable
>>
That is great news!
> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:07, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We plan to release warrior by end of month.
> We also want to see if we can backport patches of u-boot from Luca to enable
> cleaner SPL flow for PMU config objects.
> If we cannot do it by
Hi All,
We plan to release warrior by end of month.
We also want to see if we can backport patches of u-boot from Luca to enable
cleaner SPL flow for PMU config objects.
If we cannot do it by 6/30, we want to make sure we can add it after the
release branch is cut.
Please see:
