On 24-03-17 02:07, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
Alright, I have some early signs of success.
I dissected the problem I was having with my option 1. (today's masters on
u-boot-xlnx and linux-xlnx) I have my prompt on the rootfs stored on part 2 of
the SD card. Very basic sanity performed, nee
Correction on my last email...
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 21:07, Jean-Francois Dagenais
> wrote:
>
> I dissected the problem I was having with my option 1. (today's masters on
> u-boot-xlnx and linux-xlnx) I have my prompt on the rootfs stored on part 2
> of the SD card. Very basic sanity performe
Alright, I have some early signs of success.
I dissected the problem I was having with my option 1. (today's masters on
u-boot-xlnx and linux-xlnx) I have my prompt on the rootfs stored on part 2 of
the SD card. Very basic sanity performed, need to go to bed now ;)
Here are the mods I had to do
Hi guys,
Thanks for sticking around.
I have dug more in xilinx docs, the SDK, u-boot-xlnx source. My position right
now is that we are vested in the workflow presented by the zedboard supported
in meta-xilinx. We are building everything through CI scripts and docker
images. It is much harder a
On 21-03-17 10:14, Mike Looijmans wrote:
On 21-03-17 09:59, Michal Simek wrote:
On 20.3.2017 21:29, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
...
Now the problem is... where the heck is version 0.3! I have not seen any
branches on the xilinx repo containing it.
I am no pmufw maintainer to tell you more
On 21.3.2017 15:24, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>
>> On Mar 21, 2017, at 04:59, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>> You need pmufw with configuration blob in it. Or pass it. This option is
>> not supported now that's why it is not working.
> I don't understand any of this... "configuration blob"? This is
On 21-03-17 15:24, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider t
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 04:59, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> You need pmufw with configuration blob in it. Or pass it. This option is
> not supported now that's why it is not working.
I don't understand any of this... "configuration blob"? This is new to me.
> Not sure what's the plan to fix this.
Wel
On 21.3.2017 03:26, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>
>> On Mar 20, 2017, at 21:48, Jean-Francois Dagenais
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2017, at 16:29, Jean-Francois Dagenais
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So please advise, I was under the impression that I needed recent commits in
>>> u-boot-xlnx related
On 21-03-17 09:59, Michal Simek wrote:
On 20.3.2017 21:29, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
Hi guys,
I am really riding the bleeding edge here...
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33
On 20.3.2017 21:29, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am really riding the bleeding edge here...
>
>> On Mar 17, 2017, at 13:37, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>>
>> Not alternate, since given the error you have not loaded any pmu
>> firmware. But yes, this is only relevant because you are usi
> On Mar 20, 2017, at 21:48, Jean-Francois Dagenais
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 20, 2017, at 16:29, Jean-Francois Dagenais
>> wrote:
>>
>> So please advise, I was under the impression that I needed recent commits in
>> u-boot-xlnx related to SD for booting on it. Should I use another specific
>>
> On Mar 20, 2017, at 16:29, Jean-Francois Dagenais
> wrote:
>
> So please advise, I was under the impression that I needed recent commits in
> u-boot-xlnx related to SD for booting on it. Should I use another specific
> version of u-boot-xlnx? Again, just want to get past all that and execute
Hi Jason,
Sorry for coming back so late,
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 22:33, Jason Wu wrote:
>
>
> just adding additional note, you also need a newer version (0.3 IIRC) of
> pmu-firmware else u-boot-xlnx master will not boot and complaints about
> it. I am not sure if the 0.3 version of pmu-fw has be
Hi guys,
I am really riding the bleeding edge here...
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 13:37, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>
> Not alternate, since given the error you have not loaded any pmu
> firmware. But yes, this is only relevant because you are using
> u-boot-xlnx master.
>
> The commit that introduced the
On 18 March 2017 at 02:45, Jean-Francois Dagenais
wrote:
>
>> On Mar 17, 2017, at 03:16, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>>
>> On 17 March 2017 at 05:27, Jean-Francois Dagenais
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it ok for me not to care about the PMU FW or ATF at this point of our
>>> development?
>>
>> For PMU Firmw
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 03:16, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 05:27, Jean-Francois Dagenais
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is it ok for me not to care about the PMU FW or ATF at this point of our
>> development?
>
> For PMU Firmware, sure you can probably ignore it and use the
> xilinx-v2016.4
On 17 March 2017 at 05:27, Jean-Francois Dagenais
wrote:
>
>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 15:00, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>>
>> If this is the artifact name that u-boot expects then the
>> arm-trusted-firmware recipe should create a deployed symlink with that
>> name as well.
>
> Is it ok for me not to care a
On 17/03/2017 5:00 AM, Nathan Rossi wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 04:22, Jean-Francois Dagenais
> wrote:
>> Hi Shabbir,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer. See below...
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 13:51, Shabbir Khan wrote:
>>
>> Can you try creating atf-uboot.ub image using below command:
>>
>> /usr/bi
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 15:00, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>
> If this is the artifact name that u-boot expects then the
> arm-trusted-firmware recipe should create a deployed symlink with that
> name as well.
Is it ok for me not to care about the PMU FW or ATF at this point of our
development?
If I don
On 17 March 2017 at 04:22, Jean-Francois Dagenais
wrote:
> Hi Shabbir,
>
> Thanks for your answer. See below...
>
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 13:51, Shabbir Khan wrote:
>
> Can you try creating atf-uboot.ub image using below command:
>
> /usr/bin/mkimage -A arm64 -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0XFFFEA00
Hi Shabbir,
Thanks for your answer. See below...
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 13:51, Shabbir Khan wrote:
>
> Can you try creating atf-uboot.ub image using below command:
>
> /usr/bin/mkimage -A arm64 -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0XFFFEA000 -e
> 0XFFFEA000 -d /path/to/bl31.bin atf-uboot.ub
>
The y
Hi guys,
We now have our zcu102 board and I have been trying to boot SD on it using only
yocto (meta-xilinx).
These are my changes in the machine conf:
diff --git a/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf b/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf
index c55b536..c220c1b 100644
--- a/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.co
23 matches
Mail list logo
