> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:10:14 -0800 (PST)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Digest metacard.v003.n277
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
>
>> At 11:30 AM -0800 3/10/2000, Scott Raney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> ar
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, andu wrote:
> >Coincidentally, LiangTyan Fui just sent me such a client. It looks a
> >little rough and I haven't really tested it, but it looks very
> >complete and does support both POP and SMTP (although only via a relay
> >because of the MX record support problem discuss
>On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 andu wrote:
>
>
>> Just by looking at sendmail configuration made me decide that the
>> "easy" way is to write the whole thing from scratch (a third of it I
>> did already). Something like this could run on anyone's computer
>> even with a dynamic IP address using a stati
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 andu wrote:
> Just by looking at sendmail configuration made me decide that the
> "easy" way is to write the whole thing from scratch (a third of it I
> did already). Something like this could run on anyone's computer
> even with a dynamic IP address using a static name from
test
Regards, Andu
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
>On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, David Bovill wrote:
>
>> Thought so, but I gather there is a problem with being able to do this?
>
>Only the amount of work required. Actually one other problem is that
>it might be hard to find an ISP willing to host it: Most of them have
>no problem installing MetaCard eng
On 11/3/00 6:01 am, Craig Spooner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been studying the great examples of launching a web browser on
> both the Mac and Windows posted by Hugh, Tuviah, and Kevin. Thanks
> you all for sharing that stuff. I have a couple of questions about
> it that
