Hi,
if I understood the problem of this discussion it´s how to make it possible
to open a stack as a user or as the developer...
in hyperCard there are userLevels
on the highest userLevel was the developer
so if it was no standalone the developer could easy type "set userLevel
to" - was it 6? I c
> From: Scott Raney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 10:36:04 -0600 (MDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Avoiding home... script limit problem.
>
>>
>> How about a property for the stack, which would allow y
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote/ schreef:
> Um, Scott...when you double-click an AppleScript it does open it. ;-)
As you say here yourself, that depends on how you saved it ;;-)
> Since you bring up AppleScript, why not use its solution? AppleScript files
> are either editable or executable: if executa
At 10:36 AM -0600 9/7/00, Scott Raney wrote:
>> > How about adding a preference setting to MC, allowing the user to set
>> > whether the development environment launches or not?
>>
>> How about a property for the stack, which would allow you the developer to
>> determine how the stack behaved, re
on 9/7/00 9:36 AM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> How about a property for the stack, which would allow you the developer to
>> determine how the stack behaved, regardless of the machine it was opened on?
>
> Sounds good to me. Anyone else? What's the default?
How about a preferen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Geoff Canyon wrote:
> on 9/6/00 1:04 PM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > OK, for you Mac users, how about each time you try to run an
> > AppleScript it instead brings up the Script Editor? Wouldn't be very
> > convenient, would it?
>
> But this is exactly the
on 9/6/00 1:04 PM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, for you Mac users, how about each time you try to run an
> AppleScript it instead brings up the Script Editor? Wouldn't be very
> convenient, would it?
But this is exactly the way it works. You can save an AppleScript in two
ways,
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote/ schreef:
> Um, Scott...when you double-click an AppleScript it does open it. ;-)
As you say here yourself, that depends on how you saved it ;;-)
> Since you bring up AppleScript, why not use its solution? AppleScript files
> are either editable or executable: if executa
This seems exactly right - it's not an either or issue. There are times when
each strategy achieves the result that the author intended.
>
> Since you bring up AppleScript, why not use its solution? AppleScript files
> are either editable or executable: if executable, opening one launches it,
>
At 7:52 PM -0700 9/6/2000, Scott Raney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, for you Mac users, how about each time you try to run an
>AppleScript it instead brings up the Script Editor? Wouldn't be very
>convenient, would it?
Um, Scott...when you double-click an AppleScript it does open it. ;-)
Sinc
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, andu wrote:
> >Recently, Scott Raney wrote:
> >
> >> This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
> >> applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
> >> over the years. My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
> >> appli
>Are you going to sit at your WWW server console 24x7 so that every
>time a CGI program runs it won't start up the development
>environment?)
That's a good idea - it will shrink the unemployment to -10;-)
> Regards,
>Scott
>
Regards, Andu
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ar
>
>Recently, Scott Raney wrote:
>
>> This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
>> applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
>> over the years. My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
>> applications, whereas people with a less techn
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, David Bovill wrote:
> Lot's of philosophy here, which seems to go with everyone's previous user
> experience and background...
>
> But cutting through this there is a practical problem. If (as I do) you are
> interested in distributing information, to people in a number of se
Lot's of philosophy here, which seems to go with everyone's previous user
experience and background...
But cutting through this there is a practical problem. If (as I do) you are
interested in distributing information, to people in a number of separate
stacks you want them to be able to open any
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Scott Rossi wrote:
> Recently, Scott Raney wrote:
>
> > This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
> > applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
> > over the years. My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
> > appl
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Jacqueline Landman Gay wrote:
> Scott Raney wrote:
>
> > This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
> > applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
> > over the years. My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
> > app
Scott Raney wrote:
> This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
> applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
> over the years. My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
> applications, whereas people with a less technical background tend
Recently, Scott Raney wrote:
> This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
> applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
> over the years. My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
> applications, whereas people with a less technical backg
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, David Bovill wrote:
> I want to be able to launch a stack directly from the file system, but with
> all the usual features of the development environment. I've filled in the
> Menubar field in the Stack Properties" dialog and copied the following
> script from the home stack:
I want to be able to launch a stack directly from the file system, but with
all the usual features of the development environment. I've filled in the
Menubar field in the Stack Properties" dialog and copied the following
script from the home stack:
send "preOpenStack" to card 1 of stack "Me
21 matches
Mail list logo
