Re: Return Character Substitute

2002-04-10 Thread Sjoerd Op 't Land
Ray Horsley wrote/ schreef: > Any suggestions on a good substitute for the return character. What about urlEncode() -ing the input? > Thanks, > > > Ray Horsley Regards, / Groeten, Sjoerd ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runre

Re: Call WinAPI?

2002-04-10 Thread Phil Davis
I opened a DOS window on my Win98SE machine and got this info about 'start'. Looks like it should indeed be able to launch an app minimized. = beginning Microsoft(R) Windows 98 (C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1999. C:\WINDOWS>start /? Runs a Windows pro

Re: Mystery with arrays (lost key)

2002-04-10 Thread andu
Tariel Gogoberidze wrote: > > > From: Dave Cragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Mystery with arrays (lost key) > > > >on mouseUp > > > IF 1=2 THEN > > > put 1 into test2 > > > else > > > put 55 into GrandTotals[test1] > > > put 66 into GrandTotals[test2] > > > put 22

Re: Mystery with arrays (lost key)

2002-04-10 Thread Tariel Gogoberidze
> From: Dave Cragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Mystery with arrays (lost key) > >on mouseUp > > IF 1=2 THEN > > put 1 into test2 > > else > > put 55 into GrandTotals[test1] > > put 66 into GrandTotals[test2] > > put 22 into GrandTotals[test3] > > end if > > > > p

Re: Call WinAPI?

2002-04-10 Thread Dar Scott
On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 07:24 PM, Ken Ray wrote: > If they don't have a command line argument, you will need to have > some other > app (such as a small VB app) do this for you (unless someone else > knows how > to do this). Try the shell command "start". I use it for console apps a

Re: Call WinAPI?

2002-04-10 Thread Ken Ray
Scott, All that means is to use the shell() command to launch their setup application. SW_SHOWMINIMIZED means (I believe) that the setup application should be launched in a minimized state. This may be able to be done by passing a switch to the shell() command line argument. If you can determine

Call WinAPI?

2002-04-10 Thread Scott Rossi
I have a MetaCard stack that launches a client's installer (InstallShield). The client wants to me to determine if I can hide the decompress progressbar of their installer using my MetaCard stack. I was asked by the programmer of the client to see if I can get MetaCard to "call WinAPI to lau

Re: MetaCard 2.4.2 gamma-test

2002-04-10 Thread erik hansen
is "Metacard 2.4.2B4 PPC" good for Mac 9.2.2? = [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikhansen.org __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _

Re: Protecting Things from prying eyes....

2002-04-10 Thread Michael Crawford
I recently ask the list for suggestions about the best method for protecting images that are stored on an web server but accessed from within Metacard. Thanks to everyone who responded. Here are a couple of follow up notes... Dave Cragg suggested. >One way would be to store the images as cus

RE: Determine Write Protection?

2002-04-10 Thread Yates, Glen
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Thanks for this Glen. Actually, what I need to verify is that a > selected directory has write permissions. It appears from checking > several pre-existing writable folders that the octal is 777 > on these. > So

Re: hypertext

2002-04-10 Thread Michael Crawford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Need help writing a script for a hypertext link in a field that is not > locked. > > I want to paste URLs in an unlocked field and open the URL when the hypertext > is selected.or whatever..the field must be unlocked to accept notes as well. Andu wrote: on selectio

Re: Determine Write Protection?

2002-04-10 Thread Scott Rossi
>> From: Scott Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> In answer to the above, it is correct that I can use the detailed >> folders function to retrieve the file permissions of a >> folder? If yes, >> then apparently "777" is OK to write, but "555" is read-only? > > Well, more accurately "777" is re

Re: Determine Write Protection?

2002-04-10 Thread andu
Scott Rossi wrote: > > I asked: > > > On Windows, is there any way to determine if a folder or the drive is > > write-protected without actually trying to write a file? > > In answer to the above, it is correct that I can use the detailed > folders function to retrieve the file permissions of a

RE: Determine Write Protection?

2002-04-10 Thread Yates, Glen
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > In answer to the above, it is correct that I can use the detailed > folders function to retrieve the file permissions of a > folder? If yes, > then apparently "777" is OK to write, but "555" is read-only? Well, mo

Re: Determine Write Protection?

2002-04-10 Thread Scott Rossi
I asked: > On Windows, is there any way to determine if a folder or the drive is > write-protected without actually trying to write a file? In answer to the above, it is correct that I can use the detailed folders function to retrieve the file permissions of a folder? If yes, then apparentl

Determine Write Protection?

2002-04-10 Thread Scott Rossi
On Windows, is there any way to determine if a folder or the drive is write-protected without actually trying to write a file? Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director, Tactile Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tactilemedia.com ___ metacard mailing li

MetaCard 2.4.2 gamma-test

2002-04-10 Thread Scott Raney
The MetaCard 2.4.2 gamma test (release candidate) is now available in the directory ftp://ftp.metacard.com/MetaCard/2.4.2/ Only the usual Win32/Mac/Linux engines are available there now, but we'll be building the rest of the UNIX platforms over the next couple of days and will put them in that di

Re: Mystery with arrays (lost key)

2002-04-10 Thread Robert Brenstein
>For me, the use of non-quoted literals is more the source of >confusion than any other factor. If they weren't allowed, then MC >would require the above lines in question to look like this: >> put 1 into test2 >> put 55 into GrandTotals["test1"] >> put 66 into GrandTotals[test2

Re: Mystery with arrays (lost key)

2002-04-10 Thread Dave Cragg
At 7:11 pm -0400 9/4/02, andu wrote: >In this case test2 is still a variable but it also has a value and >keys() returns the correct number of keys. Having to quote or not a >variable name depending on it having a value is not exactly the Metacard >I use to know ;-). Don't you have this the wrong