Recently, Shari wrote:
>> Is it possible that you password-protected the stack in the standalone? I
>> think you should be able to do all the above provided the stack is not
>> protected.
>
> One embedded stack is encrypted, but not the one that used the
> handler, or the one the handler was in
Sorry all,
Please ignore my previous post. It was meant for Scott alone. Darn that
"Reply" button!
tereza
+ Tereza Snyder
+ Senior Software Developer
+ Attainment Company, Inc.
+
+ 800.327.4269
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://li
on 09.21.02 1:37 PM, Scott Raney wrote:
> The Mac OS X engine is currently stuck at build 4. There are a few
> things that Jaguar (Mac OS X 10.2) broke, but unfortunately they're
> mostly problems with Jaguar itself that we must wait for Apple to fix.
I need to build a macOS X version of the Go
>Is it possible that you password-protected the stack in the standalone? I
>think you should be able to do all the above provided the stack is not
>protected.
One embedded stack is encrypted, but not the one that used the
handler, or the one the handler was in.
I ran into several limitations i
