Like Wilhelm, I've also started to incorporate Richard's dictionary
shell into the MC IDE. Mine doesn't do as much as Wilhelm's. But if all
you are interested in is the Transcript dictionary contents, then this
little utility will move it into the MC IDE, change the Help menu to use
the new dic
Greetings List:
Hopefully several fixes are now working in the IDE stack manager (it's a
first attempt so there may be other issues). The latest version is
available for playing with, via the message box, here:
go stack url "http://www.i-view.net/tm_stack_manager.mc";
The following are some l
Returning to my computer after a three days' absence I very much like
to join the queue of people congratulating Ruchard on his
"FWTranscriptDictionary". I think that for most of us it is more of a
"final" language guide solution.
The FWTranscriptDictionary is only 2.5 MB, whereas my modified Rev
Hi listers,
I just tried to create a win standalone on my win2000 pc
with the new (RR) 2.5.1 engine renamed to Metacard.exe.
Although everything else works very fine, i get the error:
File C:/path/to/mc.exe is not a MetaCard Win32 engine.
A look at the script reveals that mc is looking for the e
Hi listers,
For your information:
I just tried to create a win standalone on my win2000 pc
with the new (RR) 2.5.1 engine renamed to Metacard.exe.
Although everything else works very fine, i get the error:
File C:/path/to/mc.exe is not a MetaCard Win32 engine.
A look at the script reveals that
BTW, some changes have been made to the stack manager regarding the locking
-- those folks who current have it open can close it and relaunch it from
the server to get the latest version (isn't online delivery nice?).
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design
-
Recently, "David Bovill" wrote:
> Great. I think it's granular enough for now.
>
> Uploading doesn't replace stack but uploads a copy to the root folder.
That isn't good, obviously -- by any chance did you download more than one
stack? Currently there's no management for this.
> And the lock
Scott Rossi wrote:
> Recently, "Richard Gaskin" wrote:
>
>>> I went ahead tried to do something, for better or worse.
>
>> What would it take to enhance it to also work on substacks? While some have
>> expressed an interest in even greater granularity, I think substacks are
>> probably enough
Richard Gaskin wrote:
If this seems useful to folks, let's talk about how this can be
enhanced/developed/customized/etc. Maybe we can start getting some work
done.
A way nifty gadget, Scott.
Great. I think it's granular enough for now.
Uploading doesn't replace stack but uploads a copy to the
Recently, "Richard Gaskin" wrote:
>> I went ahead tried to do something, for better or worse.
> What would it take to enhance it to also work on substacks? While some have
> expressed an interest in even greater granularity, I think substacks are
> probably enough for a good many people. If th
From: "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jacque snapped back:
> Oh thanks. Appeal to my ego to get me to do work. Nice going, guys.
Aw. It wasn't supposed to be a snap. It was supposed to be a
tongue-in-cheek comment delivered with a twinkle in the eye. I think I
forgot the smiley. ;)
An
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Dual-use options seem optimal for all. There are a great many very smart,
experienced people with a demonstrated interest in producing free software
who use only Rev. Those enhancements that work in both IDEs benefit from
the combined brainpower available to both camps.
Agr
Scott Rossi wrote:
> I've watched a fair amount of discourse fly on the list regarding "open
> source this" and "SourceForge that", and I'm wondering if it might be time
> to just dive into some kind of development option. So, I went ahead tried
> to do something, for better or worse.
>
> I took
David Bovill wrote:
> It would be wrong to limit the open source project *too* much at this
> early stage - who knows what form the project will be taking on in 12
> months - it could stay the same or it could grow. I agree with Robert
> that we have nothing to loose by aiming a bit higher.
The d
Oh Grandest of Poobahs and MC List:
I've watched a fair amount of discourse fly on the list regarding "open
source this" and "SourceForge that", and I'm wondering if it might be time
to just dive into some kind of development option. So, I went ahead tried
to do something, for better or worse.
I
Hello everyone,
How can I invoke the default browser in OS X and go to a web site when
I user clicks on an URL in a field in MC?
Regards,
Greg
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Richard Gaskin wrote:
If someone's willing to pay for a neutral host with more space for at
least
a few years I'm game to use it.
OK - so I'll set this up by the weekend.
Robert Brenstein wrote:
If we really stick to distributing just MC IDE, then sure, 20 mb will
suffice.
It would be wrong to
Hi Hugh
Two date questions...
I am trying to manipulate locale-independent dates by using dateItems,
system weekdayNames and system monthNames. As I only have an
English-based system, could any non-English system users help me out?
[1] Date format convert...
on mouseUp
put line 6 of the abbrev
Two date questions...
I am trying to manipulate locale-independent dates by using dateItems, system
weekdayNames and system monthNames. As I only have an English-based system, could any
non-English system users help me out?
[1] Date format convert...
on mouseUp
put line 6 of the abbrev syste
Two date questions...
I am trying to manipulate locale-independent dates by using dateItems, system
weekdayNames and system monthNames. As I only have an English-based system, could any
non-English system users help me out?
[1] Date format convert...
on mouseUp
put line 6 of the abbrev syste
There already is an archive of the engines (thank you Mr. Talutto!), and any
longer-term plans to host one are in the best interests of both Runrev and
the community they serve to be at runrev.com. I can't imagine why they
wouldn't jump at the opportunity to provide such a valuable service to the
Xavier writes:
> The difference may be that any bit of script may be taken by yahoo for
> commercial exploitation for free and without recourse to legal action
> in case they would want to take it back.
Scott sez he doesn't care if it goes public domain. He could use it to make
something new if
22 matches
Mail list logo
