For some reason, and after lots of asking
my studio license was inserted in the list.
Then it was removed by Heather - and
she never looked if i wasn't also an enterprise user.
It's not like i haven't already logged
10% of all open bugzillas either...
im seriously displeased at this level
As an enterprise user, i never got a
wiff of a test cycle or beta release...
in my 3 days of testing i logged 6 bugs
already - 2 of which are bloquers!
-=-
Xavier Bury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16.02.2006
08:13:12:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Ri
Yeah, I agree. I tend to be more 'free' on this list than use-rev. And
count me to blame a bit for the Windows testing, but frankly, sometimes
I have time for testing, and other times I just don't.
The testing process is a difficult one, but there are convential
practices for doing it-- many t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Richard,
Not your fault, it's mine.
Im at fault for hijacking the subject to rev. I thought it important to
make the point to the wider audience - mostly PC users who will be
seriously disapointed at the apparent lack of testing in 2.7 for winXP.
I believe it wa
Hi Richard,
Not your fault, it's mine.
Im at fault for hijacking the subject
to rev. I thought it important to make the point to the wider audience
- mostly PC users who will be seriously disapointed at the apparent lack
of testing in 2.7 for winXP.
cheers
Xavier Bury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
MisterX wrote:
Sims said
I'm planning on sticking with 2.6.1 until at least a
version or two of upgrades are announced.
Rev 2.6.1 for at least a week (if not more).
TEST TEST TEST, then sell.
This feels more like the microsoft software release process - release, sell
THEN fix...
I too
Sims said
> >>I'm planning on sticking with 2.6.1 until at least a
> version or two of upgrades are announced.
> >Rev 2.6.1 for at least a week (if not more).
> >TEST TEST TEST, then sell.
> >
This feels more like the microsoft software release process - release, sell
THEN fix...
I too am rev
Oopssorry.
Too early here and not enough coffee.
Wrong 'To:' - Let's see 'Wake up before pressing send.'
sims
At 5:54 PM -0600 2/15/06, Chipp Walters wrote:
With all due respect to MW, I've found problems with the Standalone
Builder in Rev (not MC) which he originally claimed weren't
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark W sez that all we need to do is point to the new engines for
building standalones in the Rev install.
I just played with it but I can't get it to work. Mark's comments
elsewhere say that the build process hasn't changed, but it sounds like
we need to point the bui
At 5:54 PM -0600 2/15/06, Chipp Walters wrote:
With all due respect to MW, I've found problems with the Standalone
Builder in Rev (not MC) which he originally claimed weren't there. I
assume he's got so much on his plate that it's difficult to catch
every issue. And of course, many of us had ch
Chipp Walters wrote:
He's a wonderful asset to both the company and community. His work is
certainly split among most various and important tasks, and he still
finds time to help us out individually.
I love the guy. Mark is Runtime's greatest asset. Brilliant, too.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay
I should correct myself, Mark has directed me to the correct method of
installing database drivers in order for them to be incorporated into
the build process.
He's a wonderful asset to both the company and community. His work is
certainly split among most various and important tasks, and he s
With all due respect to MW, I've found problems with the Standalone
Builder in Rev (not MC) which he originally claimed weren't there. I
assume he's got so much on his plate that it's difficult to catch every
issue. And of course, many of us had chances to test this as well during
beta cycle. J
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Klaus Major wrote:
Hi friends,
when i build a standalone with the new engine I get this error:
The file MetaCard.app//.../metacard is no MetaCard engine
??? :-/
any hints are VERY welcome.
When i try to build a standalone with Rev, i get, "There was an error
buil
On 2/15/06 2:55 PM, "Reinhold Venzl-Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When I click (in Mac OS X) on the green button at the left top of the
> frame of my programwindow, it blows up the largest size. But when I
> click again it don't shrink to its former size.
>
> How do I can avoid
Klaus Major wrote:
Hi friends,
when i build a standalone with the new engine I get this error:
The file MetaCard.app//.../metacard is no MetaCard engine
??? :-/
any hints are VERY welcome.
When i try to build a standalone with Rev, i get, "There was an error
building the standalone"
w
Hi!
When I click (in Mac OS X) on the green button at the left top of the
frame of my programwindow, it blows up the largest size. But when I
click again it don't shrink to its former size.
How do I can avoid the enlargement of the programwindow ?
Reinhold
_
Aha!
Does that mean that:
MetaCard, with the 2.7 installed will produce stacks that
are in the new RR format (despite having a .mc suffix) ?
And, the presumable corollary would be that all RR/MC
stacks authored using the 2.7 engine will be unusable by
earlier recensions of both.
Owners of eithe
Mathewson wrote:
If I do the 'usual procedure' and
transfer the RR engine to my MC Demo will this mean that
should I modify stacks in my "MetaCard 2.7" and then save
them that they will end up being in the new file format?
I don't think it will be quite so simple now: the licensing scheme is
n
[Gosh, isn't it pathetic how, everytime Richmond gets
booted off the RunRev uselist he starts posting to the
MetaCard list?]
I have merrily paid 33 pounds for the new RR Media and also
expect to be able to upgrade my DreamCard just as soon as
full installers of both (Media and DreamCard upgrade)
b
Hi friends,
when i build a standalone with the new engine I get this error:
The file MetaCard.app//.../metacard is no MetaCard engine
??? :-/
any hints are VERY welcome.
When i try to build a standalone with Rev, i get, "There was an error
building the standalone"
which is not very mea
Hi Klaus and Jaqueline
Thanks for your replies, after much fiddling around I'm on the road again
(only tested on Windows).
Signe Marie
Klaus Major skrev:
Hi Jaqueline,
Signe Marie Sanne wrote:
On Windows I have just downloaded and installed Revolution 2.7 (made
a copy and renamed it to m
22 matches
Mail list logo
