Recently, John Vokey wrote:
As a Canadian Scot, I take serious offence at this comment: Bagpipes
by definition are always in tune; it is the ignorant listeners who
aren't. Besides, I heard the Romans left because of the advent of
the accordian... Now, as a one time player of same, that is
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Dave Cragg [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote:
The people of Edinburgh and the area to the south east did fight with
the Angles of Northumbria. But these were neither Picts nor Scots.
They were Britons who spoke what today would be recognised as Welsh.
Interestingly, these
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
Apart from the parts of my own scripts that are unprotected I see a lot
of extra code, some of which may belong to CRevGeneral
...
Maybe the last example could be one of the culprits that slow down
execution (?)
and such as
on mouseDoubleUp pButtonNo, pTarget
--not been
On 22 Sep 2006, at 16:10, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
In case my comments were felt to be offensive,
Not in any way. It was only because your comments were so interesting
that I felt inspired to reply. It's not often we get a thread on
something so close to home.
Coincidentally, there was a
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
why should anybody refer to stack home in a standalone?
In a standalone, the mainstack becomes home and the term home
becomes synonymous with the name of the mainstack, so you can use
either. This doesn't answer the rest of your question, of course.
--
Jacqueline
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Richard Gaskin wrote:
It might be helpful to de-standalone it to take a look at exactly
what's been included.
Once upon a time someone posted the info needed to strip the
executable from the stack -- anyone make a utility for that?
In my own collected archives I found
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
When I remove these backscripts and frontscripts in the stack no change
of the slower Rev-IDE speed is effected. So the slower performance in
Rev must be caused by other scripts.-
Very odd. If the problem is indeed related to Rev's standalones, then I
would imagine there
On 9/22/06 4:13 PM, Wilhelm Sanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Applying this I get 13 front and back scripts running in the stack and
nothing of this in the standalone (in the standalone only my script
library clib and the calling button for listing the back and
frontscripts are listed).
Well, I
On 21/9/06 22:37, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the revGeneral library is always included. There is no option
to turn it off, which is usually okay, since the majority of Rev users
need at least some part of that library.
What a strange design decision.
I've helped
