Re: Automated setup file uploaded

2007-07-16 Thread J. Landman Gay
Tariel Gogoberidze wrote: As soon as I tried to save "home" stack I got "can't open stack backup file" error, same error that I'm getting from time to time in my MC IDE. The second attempt to save is always successful which probably excludes Permissions. Still It seems related to my computer o

Re: Automated setup file uploaded

2007-07-16 Thread Tariel Gogoberidze
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:28:48 -0500, "J. Landman Gay" wrote: 4) When I tried to save "home" stack in MC IDE created with "metacard_setup" I got "can't open stack backup file" error. Recently I'm getting such error from time to time in my version of MC IDE as well, so it may have something with

Re: Automated setup file uploaded

2007-07-16 Thread Ken Ray
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:23:26 +0100, David Bovill wrote: > How about what the marketing people would say - give on a ".mc" > extension and colour it yellow or soemthing and the other one a > ".rev" extension and colour it blue? > > Talking of which - how do you tell which environment you are in?

Re: Automated setup file uploaded

2007-07-16 Thread David Bovill
How about what the marketing people would say - give on a ".mc" extension and colour it yellow or soemthing and the other one a ".rev" extension and colour it blue? Talking of which - how do you tell which environment you are in? If there is no way can I suggest we have something in the backscrip

Re: Automated setup file uploaded

2007-07-16 Thread J. Landman Gay
Jan Schenkel wrote: > The first thing I didn't know was the license key > stuff, and then it came with a '.mc' extension, which > lead me to believe that perhaps this was only meant > for people who already had it installed. That's a very good point. I'm not sure whether it should have an exten

Re: Plugins

2007-07-16 Thread Ken Ray
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:01:52 +0100, David Bovill wrote: > So the question is - is it a good idea to have plugin compatability > and if so these messages should be added to the front script of the MC > IDE. But maybe there is a more minimal way? > > I guess there could be a "revMessages" plugin -

Re: Plugins

2007-07-16 Thread David Bovill
On 16/07/07, Klaus Major <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgot to answer the last question. Let me put it this way: Docs? We don't need no stinking docs! :-D Seriously, since this is all done on a volunteer base, you should not exspect a documentation of our work. No expectations - and i am hap

Re: Plugins

2007-07-16 Thread Klaus Major
Hi David, I took a quick look at the Plugins interface for MC - it differs from Revs naturally :) My question regards the plugin API - is it the same as Revs - so are plugins compatible? Are there any docs? Forgot to answer the last question. Let me put it this way: Docs? We don't need no st

Re: Plugins

2007-07-16 Thread Klaus Major
Hi David, I took a quick look at the Plugins interface for MC - it differs from Revs naturally :) My question regards the plugin API - is it the same as Revs - so are plugins compatible? Are there any docs? Since plugins are just stacks, there should not be any problems as long as the plugi

Plugins

2007-07-16 Thread David Bovill
I took a quick look at the Plugins interface for MC - it differs from Revs naturally :) My question regards the plugin API - is it the same as Revs - so are plugins compatible? Are there any docs? ___ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http

Re: Automated setup file uploaded

2007-07-16 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan Schenkel wrote: > > > Since I don't have any previous Metacard license > > (though I do have a Revolution Enterprise > license), > > what exacly should I do to create a Metacard > 2.8.1? > > As Klaus mentioned, a MC license isn't required any