Re: Standalone Building

On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:16 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: Richard Gaskin wrote: The full sentence in which RunRev's Oliver Kenyon suggested the need for an engine change is worth noting: To fix the issue, we will need to make an engine change, possibly the addition of a "repeat for each control"

Re: Standalone Building

Richard wrote: For lazy people like myself, the link to that report is: The full sentence in which RunRev's Oliver Kenyon suggested the need for an engine change is worth noting: To fix the issue, we will need to make an engine c

Re: Standalone Building

Richard Gaskin wrote: The full sentence in which RunRev's Oliver Kenyon suggested the need for an engine change is worth noting: To fix the issue, we will need to make an engine change, possibly the addition of a "repeat for each control" loop form. So rather than something irritating, it

Re: Standalone Building

Wilhelm Sanke wrote: What irritates me is that they speak of a necessary change to the *engine*, which kind of engine is involved her? What does "(ide) engine" mean, which - according to the engine-change log - will implement the standalone building in dp4 and in the future. If this engine is

Re: Standalone Building

There has been movement from the side of the Rev team concerning this issue. Read comment #10 that has been added to my bug report #2217 today. They confirm that the problem is indeed removing the "development properties". What irritates me is that they speak of a necessary change to the *en

Re: Standalone Building

Hugh Senior wrote: IF the new standAlone builder forces the inclusion of spurious "development properties" to each control, I for one shall not be upgrading. Klaus answered: "As far as I know this is NOT part of the process of building the standalone but a scripted Rev IDE only thingie!" AF

Re: Standalone Building

Hugh Senior wrote: This is good. The less, the better. Or as my husband says, "The less, the more". :) I agree with you. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

Re: Standalone Building

> IF the new standAlone builder forces the inclusion of spurious "development > properties" to each control, I for one shall not be upgrading. Klaus answered: "As far as I know this is NOT part of the process of building the standalone but a scripted Rev IDE only thingie!" Jacqueline answered: "R