Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-29 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Yes. On 29-Jan-05, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So in short, the question is: Are we comfortable with the final release of MC IDE v2.6 being compatible only with engine v2.6 and later? -- John R. Vokey, PhD Professor B.E.R.G. - Behaviour and Evolution Research Group Micro-Cognition Labo

Re: metacard Digest, Vol 14, Issue 7

2004-11-09 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Richard, I don't think you answered the question Robert Brenstein asked. So, with FlipsIDE currently, if I have some low-level RR license (i.e., not Enterprise), what happens when I flip to MC? Are the standalone builder stacks locked out somehow? With DreamCard, for example, I don't need

Re: tools stack version (2.6) doesn't match engine version

2004-10-17 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Thank you, Richard. Does that mean that there will be scripted versions of the engine changes to compensate for the use of an older engine, or merely that the IDE will not rely on any of these changes, or what? On 17-Oct-04, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I just installed the lat

tools stack version (2.6) doesn't match engine version (2.6.1)

2004-10-16 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
All, I just installed the latest test version of the MC IDE for Mac OS X, and I get the (harmless) error in the subject line. -- John R. Vokey, PhD Professor B.E.R.G. - Behaviour and Evolution Research Group Micro-Cognition Laboratory Department of Psychology & Neuroscience University of Lethbr

Re: Basic scrollbar question

2004-09-22 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
The Thumb Size also affects the number and distribution of the tick marks. On 22-Sep-04, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ken Ray wrote: Also not sure how to control the marks - it would make sense if they were representing the pageInc value - but it is a smaller setting. It actually repres

Re: metacard Digest, Vol 8, Issue 25

2004-05-27 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
On 27-May-04, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should I proceed with a change from opening as toplevel to simply opening in the stack's native mode? No; retain the original behaviour of 14 years. What do you think is most appropriate option for an IDE with 28 users? There are a lot more than 2

Standalone builder problem

2004-05-13 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Fellow Metacardians, I don't often build standalones in Metacard (I run stacks instead), but today I had need of, so I tried it (Mac OS X 10.3.3, MC 2.5). Problem is, it doesn't work: it gets as far as creating the app bundle, but then quits with the error that it can't open MetaCard *within th

Plug ins in MC 2.6b1 and other questions

2004-04-21 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Metacardians, I see that the new MC IDE 2.6 has a plug-ins menu. Having never used one, what constitutes a plug-in? Is it just a main stack that serves a particular function? It is anything other than a stack being put in use, or do all scripts and properties of the plug-in stack become av

I know this should be simple, but...

2004-04-17 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Fellow Metacardians, For the first time in all my years using metacard on the Mac OS (currently MC 2.5 under OS X), I have the need to create a standalone for Windoze, and, to be honest, I don't have a clue how to do it. I gather I need the Windoze engine, but I have no idea whe

Graph object

2004-03-26 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Here's a start: On 26-Mar-04, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Listers, Does anybody have any ready-to-go scripts which draw charts? Preferably, I'd like to be able to draw bar, column, area, line, scatter and pie charts. (Several of those are virtually the s

defeating RR's startup oddities

2004-01-28 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Metacarders, I sent a stack to a colleague who uses RR rather than mc to run an experiment. On preopenstack, the stack does the usual to prevent the experimental participants from clicking menus or background with untoward effects: on preopenstack hide menubar set the decorations of this

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
I won't repeat Wilhelm's comments both to save space and to acknowledge the fact that I think most of us agree with the general sentiment. As a long-time supporter of Metacard (MC), I, too, have lamented in previous posts about the directions that RR has taken. I won't repeat those either. I

Re: Script Limit

2003-08-14 Thread Dr. John R. Vokey
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote: I'd urge people to drop a line to Kevin if this change would impact their products, describing how you use the capability. I can't speak for Kevin but I know he listens carefully to concerns of current customers when changes are being considered. Good advice *if one i

Script Limits vs dynamic programming

2003-08-14 Thread Dr. John R. Vokey
On Thursday, August 7, 2003 Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote: I don't understand what you mean by this. Your extensible stacks are your products. ("Product" does not mean "commercial product", nor is it restricted to standalone applications.) It sounds from your description like your products would in f

On RR acquiring Metacard

2003-07-10 Thread Dr. John R. Vokey
As with some others, I have the disquieting feeling of being ``hoist by my own petard'': on initially moving from hypercard to metacard years ago, my principle complaint (voiced on this list) with metacard was the, then, incomprehensible interface (why or why could it not be more like hypercard

Re:C function in metaTalk?

2003-03-15 Thread Dr. John R. Vokey
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 10:03 AM, on [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wouter Abraham wrote: Hi Eric, Something like this? : local theResult on mouseUp put "" into theResult put abra(fld "orig") into fld "result" end mouseUp function abra x if x <> "" then put char 2 to -1 of x into y