Re: No names of new objects with engine 5?

Hi Ken, Am 13.12.2011 um 19:44 schrieb Ken Ray: > Whoops! Need to change this: > >> 1) In the newButton handler of the MC IDE Backscript, add this before >> "choose pointer tool": >> >> set the name of the target to "New Button" I added the appropriate objects to all the "NE

Re: No names of new objects with engine 5?

Hi Ken, Am 13.12.2011 um 18:48 schrieb Ken Ray: > On Dec 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Klaus on-rev wrote: >> Hi friends, >> Am 01.11.2011 um 18:40 schrieb Klaus on-rev: >>> Hi friends, >>> someone also experienced that with engine 5.0.0 >>> newly created obje

Re: No names of new objects with engine 5?

Hi friends, Am 01.11.2011 um 18:40 schrieb Klaus on-rev: > Hi friends, > > someone also experienced that with engine 5.0.0 > newly created objects do not have a name!? this still applies to the new 5.02 engine, published today. Is there any front- or backscript in the MC IDE, wh

No names of new objects with engine 5?

Hi friends, someone also experienced that with engine 5.0.0 newly created objects do not have a name!? Best Klaus -- Klaus Major http://www.major-k.de kl...@major.on-rev.com ___ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com

Re: [ANN] MetaCard IDE 4.1

Hi Klaus, Am 30.06.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Klaus on-rev: > Hi Ken, > > Am 29.06.2011 um 04:37 schrieb Ken Ray: > >> On the heels of Jacque's announcement, I'm pleased to announce that the >> newest release of the MetaCard IDE, Version 4.1, is now available f

Re: [ANN] MetaCard IDE 4.1

Hi Ken, Am 29.06.2011 um 04:37 schrieb Ken Ray: > On the heels of Jacque's announcement, I'm pleased to announce that the > newest release of the MetaCard IDE, Version 4.1, is now available for > download. > ... very good work! :-) But I don't seem to get my scripts colorized!? I am still using

Re: changing file names on the fly

Correction: Am 17.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Klaus on-rev: > Hi Eva, > >> Is there a way to alter file names in a directory (from a MC script, not >> manually)? :-) >> >> I have hundreds of images of which the name has to be changed slightly. >> For example

Re: changing file names on the fly

Hi Eva, > Is there a way to alter file names in a directory (from a MC script, not > manually)? :-) > > I have hundreds of images of which the name has to be changed slightly. > For example: > anim1_Angle1.00_ 9.png > must be changed to (space deleted): > anim1_Angle1.00_9.png yes, use the "

Re: Statements from Kevin in 2003

Hi Wilhelm, > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:00:15 -0700, Kevin Miller wrote: >> On 11/04/2011 10:46, "Wilhelm Sanke" wrote: >> > So much for the - hopefully lifelong - relationship between Livecode >> > engines and the MC IDE. >> Well I certainly never said lifelong :) But hey, we've kept up our bargain

Re: [MC_IDE] Quick Poll

Hi Wilhelm, > On 3/30/11 12:52 PM, Wilhelm Sanke wrote: > >> Apparently the - somehow privileged - information received from RunRev >> was not comprehensive enough to let Richard and Klaus create a new >> standalone builder at once. Richard needed several contacts with more >> than one person and

Re: [MC_IDE] Quick Poll

Hallo Wilhelm, > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> In keeping with RunRev's commitment to the MC IDE, Oliver Kenyon provided >> the necessary info to allow us to use the new engine-based standalone >> building process in v4.0 and later. > I checked my mails to the Metacard list and f

Re: MC and Vista 64

Hi Eva, > I only have the old MC, version 2.4. oh, that is a very old version, and I am not sure if this is 100% compatible with Vista 64bit. It obviously isn't. Can you upgrade to a more recent version of LiveCode (form Revolution)? Seem to be the only way to avoid furhter problems. Best Kl

Re: MC and Vista 64

Hi Eva, > Does MetaCard have something against Vista 64 bit? Ever since I got my new > machine it's giving me errors for common stuff like writing commands in the > message box. Is this a known issue? Is there a fix? > > Eva > MC 2.4-3 what engine (of Revolution/LiveCode) are you using? MC 2.4

Re: How to deal with zip archives?

Hi Zryip, > From: Björnke von Gierke > > you can use externals, just need to load them yourself: > > set the externals of myStack to "revzip.bundle" > > Björnke, > > Thanks for the hint. > Looks interesting. I use to do this: 1. Copy ALL rev externals (ALL, no subfolders for the different data

Re: revCopyFile unsupported on MC?

Hi Zryip, > From: J. Landman Gay > > We decided to add all the "rev-" handlers to the dictionary for reference, > > since many of us use both IDEs. But those handlers are not in MC, as you > > found > > out. MC does not contain any rev-related front or backscripts, or any of > > its stacks in

Re: Remove the password protection of a stack & Application

Hi all, >> 1) How removing the password protection of a stack in the MC IDE. >> In the LC IDE the IDE asks me for the password when I'm trying to open a > script >> in the stack. In the MC IDE, I'm informed that the stack is password > protected >> but not asking a password > Hi zryip > The MC IDE

MC IDE, REV and building standalones

Hi all, the current version of the MC IDE can be used with engines >= 4, but is NOT able to build standalones with the new process REV introduced with 4.0. This means you can only build standalones with engines <=3.5. I hope I can publish a new IDE in a couple of weeks or maybe months, consideri

Re: MC IDE 4

Hi friends, thank you all for your sympathy! > On 4/23/10 3:03 AM, Klaus on-rev wrote: >> Hi all, >> >>> Dear Klaus, >>> How is the MC IDE 4 coming along? or are you going to hop >>> a version and let us have 4.5? >> >> sorry for the lon

Re: MC IDE 4

Hi all, > Dear Klaus, > How is the MC IDE 4 coming along? or are you going to hop > a version and let us have 4.5? sorry for the long delay. I have been sick for a longer time and had (and still have) a lot of personal problems and now I lost my job and will so have the time to finish and re

Re: Questons to IDE 4

Hi Robert, > On 03.01.2010 at 16:31 Uhr +0100 Klaus on-rev apparently wrote: >> Hi friends, >> >> I am currently working on the new MC IDE 4 and while I am at this, >> there are some questions concerning the output of the new standalone >> building process.

Questons to IDE 4

Hi friends, I am currently working on the new MC IDE 4 and while I am at this, there are some questions concerning the output of the new standalone building process. OS X: Would you like to output a: ppc, fat AND intel apps at the same time like Rev does? This would require to create subfolder(s)

Re: Shortcut for resizing a selected object ?

Hi Richard, > FWIW, here's the simplified version I put into my copy of the MC IDE. I find > it useful - should we add it to the master? Yes, sure! Any objections? No? Good :-) > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World Media Corporation > __

Re: Standalone Building

Hallo Wilhelm, Klaus wrote: Still unsure what "RevStandaloneSetting" has got ot do with MC? Stack "RevStandaloneSettings" with its substack "RevSaveAsStandalone" of the Rev IDE is the equivalent (and something more) of our Metacard "Standalone Builder". I tried to explain in my last post h

Re: Standalone Building

Hi Wilhelm, From: Klaus on-rev : I can add as many checkboxes as you like :-) , but what exactly should this one be good for? This property "cREVKeepDevelopmentProperties" has no meaning in MC, but maybe I am misunderstanding you? Klaus, It could have meaning for us in

Re: Standalone Building

Hallo Wilhelm, Richard wrote: For lazy people like myself, the link to that report is: The full sentence in which RunRev's Oliver Kenyon suggested the need for an engine change is worth noting: To fix the issue, we will need to m

Re: Standalone Building

Hi Hugh, Wilhelm: IF the new standAlone builder forces the inclusion of spurious "development properties" to each control, I for one shall not be upgrading. At present, at least we can set the custompropertysets to remove any spurious rev-IDE crap if migrating a stack from RevIDE to MC-IDE

Re: Metacard 4

Bon soir Alain, Hi Richmond Mathewson and y'all, I had Metacard 4 up and running with a dataGrid yesterday night. So.. how was it? Did it work? Is it HOT? Well, there is no reason why it should NOT work! And MC is HOT anyway :-) On a similar note, what do y'all think of the REVLET f

Re: Still here

Hi friends of the lean IDE :-) I, too, prefer the MC IDE, as do the students in the lab, despite my best efforts to get them to start with the Rev IDE (assuming that they will prefer what they first learn, and that my preference is the bias of my original MC learning). Nope, within a few m