re: Win XP: a new dawn

At 6:30 pm -0500 25/11/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The specialfolderpath function was designed to be expandable (for cases >like this), and you can pass it an integer which corresponds to a >SHGetFolderPath value/constant. > >Here's a list: Magic. Cheers Dave Archives: http://www.mail-archi

re: Win XP: a new dawn

>Program Files directory (CSIDL_PROGRAM_FILES) >Common Application Data (machine specific) (CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA) >User Application Data (user specific, roaming) (CSIDL_APPDATA) >User Local Application Data (user specific, non-roaming) (CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA) The specialfolderpath function was desig

Re: Win XP: a new dawn

A follow-up. There is some information on the proper way to do things on Microsoft's site: Then download (Word doc of course) from the following link: "Designed for Microsoft Windows XP" Application Specification 2.2 To follow these re

Re: Win XP: a new dawn

, 2001 2:10 AM Subject: Win XP: a new dawn > Hi all > > Be warned! The new dawn is what you'll see after working all night > to see if your old apps still run on XP. :) > > First, Metacard seems to run fine. I've had no "engine trouble" so > far. But

Re: Win XP: a new dawn

Dave Cragg wrote: > > Hi all > > Be warned! The new dawn is what you'll see after working all night > to see if your old apps still run on XP. :) > > First, Metacard seems to run fine. I've had no "engine trouble" so > far. But XP's new security enforcement may catch you out. (It caught > me o

Win XP: a new dawn

Hi all Be warned! The new dawn is what you'll see after working all night to see if your old apps still run on XP. :) First, Metacard seems to run fine. I've had no "engine trouble" so far. But XP's new security enforcement may catch you out. (It caught me out.) Two main problems so far: ru