Steve, List,
It's why I love tektites, as a puzzle.
Every theory explains some features;
no theory explains all the features of
those little devils.
I regard them as still a wide open
mystery, the only scientific mystery
still going strong after more than 200
years of hypothesis. (The first
A very interesting discussion but I'm lacking one thing. The shipment
cost for crossing the Atlantic works both ways. Is there anyone on the
European side that would sell small volumes to a collector over here?
/Göran
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
M
Hello
Any of you have received the confirm of the payment
2006 subscription to Meteorite? I have sent weeks ago
the credit card informations but I not see the
subscrition in the credit card paper...
Matteo
M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato
Via Triestina 126/A - 30030 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITA
As Sterling Webb wrote, if the reasoning he posited follows then there is no
way that tectites came from the moon. The distribution on the earth, the
ablation shapes, stretch forms, and lack of cosmic ray exposure pretty much
eliminate the moon as the source.
Steve Schoner
IMCA #4470
Date: S
This one is kind of funny.
http://news.yahoo.com/comics/brewsterrockit
David Hardy
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__
Meteorite-
--- "Steve Arnold, Chicago!!"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Good morning list.I have put up 10 auctions on
> ebay.A few of them are,a
> 3.58 gram slice of MORRISTOWN,a>
> steve
> arnold,chicago
the same you have ask $400 trade?
Matteo
M come Meteorit
Yes -- continued tracking would provide a measure of the object's
drag coefficient. The mass-to-area ratio would be quite high for
rocky material compared to that of most manmade space junk. --Rob
is there a publically acessable inventory of space junk? I can see Mike
Farmer already gettin
I know this was discussed a few years ago on the list but could you address
which might better for meteorites in terms of curation. If I recall, there
was some concern about the padding used in the non-membrane type boxes
being potentially harmful to meteorites.
actually, i thought there w
Hello list.I am looking for a nice sculpted piece of glorietta mountain
siderlite version.Either cash,cash/trade or trade.I would prefer
trade.Email me offlist.
steve arnold,chicago
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120
Illinois Meteorites,Ltd!
website
Hi Ron,
I know this was discussed a few years ago on the list but could you address
which might better for meteorites in terms of curation. If I recall, there
was some concern about the padding used in the non-membrane type boxes being
potentially harmful to meteorites. Thanks
-Walter Bran
Hi,
Whoops! The ultimate in late-night dopiness, replying
to my own post.
Some amplifications and clarifications occur to me right away.
First, the object that crosses the zero potential sheet with very little
residual velocity heads straight into the Earth and burns up in a
near vertical desce
Hi, Darren,
I gather from the phrase about having their orbits decay,
that by "Earth orbit," you mean "in orbit about the Earth."
Orbits around the Earth only "decay" because the orbit
touches the uppermost atmosphere enough to cause drag
which, however minute, reduces orbital velocity. It may
Hi Darren,
> So, not really a coherent question but more of a musing-- just
> how small an object at what distance can the radars that constantly
> track orbital space program junk around the Earth reliably track?
A ballpark figure is ~10 cm diameter for low-earth-orbit objects
out to perhaps 800
13 matches
Mail list logo