Absolutely wonderful! Every one should take a look. Very well done!
Now that you have jumped on this train you are in for quite a ride. Given
your photography skills, you will soon be amazing us all.
My tip. Now that you have seen what can be done, loose the plastic
polarizing film.
Hi Dave and list. I often work with circular polarizers as well as linier
polarizers. Not to mention full and 1/4 wave retardation filters.
Don't avoid the circular polarizers. When you invert them they function
as a linier polarizer. My main Xpol scope (An aus Jena Fluoval) has SunPack
Just for the record, I own no 5363, 5400 or 6292. I have no dog in this
fight.
I do however, hate to see value by exclusion being called Science If
the testing by Dr. Jambon is inadequate, then that is worth discussion,
but this close the door quick so my piece of the pie retains
Hi list, I am working on a batch of NWA 5363 (provisional) transmitted
light Xpol images and the results are turning out very good.
I was wondering what the current scoop on 5363 is. Any news of any other
pairings than 6292?
Does some one have the whole story on this?
Thanks, Tom
In
Hi List, Martin Horejsi made my day when I saw a Martin Cube sitting
next to his Ensisheim slice. There have been some great scale cubes offered
to us meteorite collectors recently and I have bought several. My old wood
cubes are not intended as competition!
When I made the first
Hi List, I must agree with Shawn on this one.
Does any one know of a case where a meteorite came out of an end
collectors collection to be used in any way in research? I am not talking
about
Bob's 1st Lunar or Adams giant Lunar (These guys are not the end collectors).
Any thing that
Well, I stand corrected. I guess my statement was much to sweeping a
generalization. There are many samples in peoples collections that would be
valuable to science and I did not mean to dismiss them so lightly.
Mike and Dirk were the first to give me examples of my error and there
were
Hi list, I am looking at a nice Gebel Kamil meteorite listed on eBay but
the seller has 0 feedback and absolutely no history of happy buyers. I
have attached the link to the auction. I was wondering if any of you know
this seller and can say anything positive or negative.
I would gladly
Thanks Mike, I'll check them out!
Tom
In a message dated 8/30/2010 1:02:50 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
voyagebotan...@hotmail.com writes:
Hello,
That is about $1.13 per gram with shipping factored in and you are taking
a risk? Check mine out... no risk and right now only a little more
Hi Count, Great to hear from you.
This is getting off topic for meteorites but I thought I would share that,
as of yet, no one has said they have had any dealings with this seller.
I lost out on a $360 microscope part that was not sent. It was a total
loss for me. Paypal only helps if
Very well done Brian! Thanks for sharing your results.
Your experience with the LDG, Libyan Desert Glass - we took it up to
1,815 Centigrade / 3,300
Degrees Fahrenheit and it was tacky on the surface , BUT did not Melt
This made me wonder again what others think of the idea that LDG
Hi Kai, I was VERY careful to not say I had any opinion on pairing. How
could you read into what I said and say that I said they were paired?
Carl's recent post (same thread) includes a letter from Dr. Jambon where
he (Dr. Jambon) said they are paired.
This is not the first email I have
Hi List, I recently added some high magnification incident light
micrographs of NWA 5363 to my micrograph gallery hosted by Meteorite
Times/Meteorite Exchange.
The sample was supplied to me by Carl Esparza. We are having some thin
sections made but for now I polished a couple thick
Faith is the action of making your self accept some thing you know not to
be true. Other wise it is just learning.
How did we get on this nonsense again?
Tom
In a message dated 7/23/2010 8:22:53 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
gee...@msn.com writes:
Hi Eric,
I don't want to get drawn
Why are we walking all over the angrite thread? I want to hear more about
NWA 6291 It is a stunning meteorite! Did you read Shawn's very
interesting post proceeded by Sterling's?
As to you two who can not let this other issue rest. Don't do your
victory dance. I think Kirk made my
Hi Mike and List, Thanks for the generous compliment Mike!
I am often asked about the best microscope to buy. I wrote a MT article
called The Right Microscope For You
http://www.meteorite-times.com/Back_Links/2008/may/Micro_Visions.htm
The key is to decide what you want to accomplish
Hi Mike and List, I was so preoccupied with finding the links in my last
post I neglected to point out the omission of Jeff Hodges.
Jeff is a skilled microscopist and has one of the largest thin section
libraries (Institutional sized) in the world. His amazing images can be
viewed
Thanks Carl, I think you are right but I have grown shy of making large
sweeping claims. When ever I do, I just learn what I don't know.
I would say that in some instances, melted material from entry remains on
the meteorite. But as it has been long accepted that the trailing edge of
an
I know I look insane answering my self but while sending NWA 2371 images
to Carl (and more specifically, selecting which ones to send) I made the
observation that the dentrites are within an only slightly altered existing
matrix structure. This means the material was not completely
Hi Adam and list,
I have been a fan of iron in lunar meteorites for quite some time. I have
a couple samples where you need a microscope to see the iron but nothing
with a chunk of iron as your Legendary - 1.478 gram part slice with metal of
Lunar meteorite NWA 5000 listing clearly has.
Hi List, Paul (Meteorite Times) has worked his magic and set up two new
articles on my meteorite micrograph gallery.
The first is NWA 6075 Lodranite found at
http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-gallery/articles/nwa-6075/
The second is a set of very high magnification images of a Lunar
That sounds like quite a thin section collection! A David New Zagami!!!
Wow!
You will find some beautiful sites in lava basalt. Check this out. It is
a lava basalt that looked like a meteorite, at least enough to have it
checked out. The thin section turned out great so I photographed
Seeing things is NOT science! You must fight the temptation. The wind
blown surface of Mars is likely to have many odd looking things.
In my micrographs I often see some weird looking things. Last night I saw
a Scotty Dog.
Many other people see things in my images (such as the blood
I must agree with Anne on this one.
Most (almost all) of my micrographs on my Meteorite Times Meteorite
Micrograph Gallery were of thin sections loaned from Jeff Hodges. He and Anne
combine efforts getting the best thin sections in the world made.
Because of the relatively high
Elizabeth is right, Seeing things in images is tempting but seldom
useful and more often than not becomes a silly game.
This may seem unrelated but the same mental process is at work. My
micrographs have caused people to See things as well.
The gallery is at
Over three years ago Jim Strope, catchafallingstar.com (He has samples
for sale) provided to me a Lunar thin section of NWA 2977. This particular
slide has a nice band of crust!
I have shared many images of this slide but I was never able to get the
crust just right. Well now I have
1.ON POSSIBLE SOLAR ORIGIN OF METEORITIC NANODIAMONDS
2.WHERE ARE THE NANODIAMONDS IN PRIMITIVE METEORITES? PRELIMINARY TEM
RESULTS
3. Presolar grains from meteorites: Remnants from the early times of
the solar system
4.Graphite/Diamond discussion. (Answer to my question)
Shawn, Once again, a very interesting post. I like this series you have
undertaken. In your last post the idea of low-pressure condensation being
similar to chemical vapor deposition at moderate temperatures got me
thinking of the unusual shape of Carbonado Diamonds.
This current post
Very interesting! Thanks Shawn for the post.
Tom
In a message dated 5/14/2010 11:28:14 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
photoph...@yahoo.com writes:
Hello Listers,
The next few days ill be posting articles that pertain to the topic of
nanodiamonds.
First up:
ON POSSIBLE SOLAR ORIGIN OF
Hi list, I have a collection of high magnification 1600X reflected light
micrographs of a NWA 6075 thin section provided by Gary Fujuhara. I plan
to make an update to my galley soon but in the mean time, My son has set me
up a Face Book group titled Tom Phillips' Meteorite
Hi Rex, Well done! I received mine today. It is among the finest scale
cubes I have ever seen (and I have quite a few!). A real work of art.
When you said you deal in jewelry I thought that was a good sign but this is
better than expected.
And yes, they are quite heavy.
I can't
Dangerous ground!
I am not saying I think one way or the other on this subject of the Moon
Landing but when you seek to stop, isolate, or ostracize any one for asking
questions it quits being Science and becomes religion.
Why go right to attacking this person? Defending your position
You make my point for me! When should intolerance be tolerated? Easy!,
When you question my sacred beliefs.
Tom
In a message dated 4/24/2010 11:16:08 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
cyna...@charter.net writes:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:54:51 EDT, you wrote:
These posts have had a disturbing
In the tone of Monty Python, Life of Brian.
What I wouldn't give for a racist web site to be using my pictures.
While the racist site use is bad, at least they seemed to be talking about
meteorites.
The nut that said I found a house fly in a Martian Meteorite has finally
recanted and
Dirk, I visit your site regularly. It is 1st class! Most people quietly
enjoy your efforts and you never hear from them. Don't let one crazed
attention seeker spoil it for all of us who do appreciate your hard work!
Tom Phillips
In a message dated 4/22/2010 6:24:07 P.M. Mountain
Hi list, It has been a while since I have written an article for
Meteorite Times (John is doing a great job with Micro Visions!). Paul still
hosts
my micrograph gallery. I think it is officially hosted by The Meteorite
Exchange and Meteorite Times.
Anyway, we just got up a cool
Hi Ken and Warren, While I agree with all you said Ken (Every thing is
correct), who want's to go through all the trouble. Like Warren, I have ben
in the same spot and just tossed the obvious wrongs in the gravel drive.
It would be more pleasant to find out up front who is selling unclass
Hi list. This is not an ad as I do not even know the seller of this
microscope.
I have shared discussions with several list members on appropriate
microscopes for their meteorite examinations and I think there are others who
are
wondering about picking up a scope so that is why I am
Way to go Count!
Are you going unannounced? I would love to see the looks on the
professors face when they discover they have a meteorite celebrity in their
class
and he brought Nevada's largest stoney meteorite!
I wish I could be there! (Still stuck in very rural Idaho) Tom
In a
Hi list. Some of you have pointed out the eBay seller claiming to have
human blood vessels in Martian meteorites. Cute and harmless nut?
I just stumbled onto this!
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-426479
A housefly found in a meteorite
March 30, 2010 | Taiwan | Vetting explained
This
Thanks Chris, That makes me feel better!
I must say you have a GREAT site http://www.cloudbait.comI
encourage other list members to check it out. Thanks!
Tom
In a message dated 4/5/2010 11:36:35 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
c...@alumni.caltech.edu writes:
This nutjob posts
Thanks for the groups link. I had no idea my images Discoveries are all
over the place. Is one guy doing it or am I famous with the nut jobs?
What do you do with a movement of insane, delusional and just plane stupid?
Tom
In a message dated 4/5/2010 11:55:39 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
So far no one has mentioned the most obvious part. This idea of small
product price/high shipping price is not new. It was pounded into the ground
by sellers and it is a trick that became synonymous (in the eBay meteorite
circle) with the fake meteorite sellers passing off hematite as
Hi Richard and List, I agree with your solution but not your objection to
sniping within the framework that is eBay.
Ebay has set up a situation where it is the smart thing to do. As you
suggest, if no item will officially end within even just one minute from the
time the last bid was
All I know is that people that use sniper programs are getting ripped off
because eBay does the same thing for free.
Shawn Alan
I don't think you get it!
Tom
In a message dated 3/17/2010 7:15:51 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
photoph...@yahoo.com writes:
Hello Listers,
My understanding
First you say All I know is that people that use sniper programs are
getting ripped off
because eBay does the same thing for free.
Shawn Alan
Then you saySo the morel to the story is, if you want the item, then
you will do anything to get it. If this means you wait to the last
Good question Richard, Enquiring minds want to know! No kidding, I would
love to find an alternative.
Tom
In a message dated 3/16/2010 11:24:25 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
damoc...@yahoo.com writes:
Much of my collection has come about by winning ebay auctions, but I can
see dealers
Hi List, First off, I want you all to know I am not taking this
seriously, just having fun with it.
About a month ago I came up with the Martin cube. A wood centimeter
scale / orientation cube that would look good next to historic meteorites.
Hence the nick name Martin Cube.
Well as it
cube
Starsinthedirt at aol.com Starsinthedirt at aol.com
Sun Mar 14 19:48:40 EDT 2010
Previous message: [meteorite-list] Hayabusa sets sights on planet Earth
for June return
Next message: [meteorite-list] A 6th reason to document meteorites
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
orientation cube
size this could make things confusing on referencing the size of a
meteorite in relation with the new inch orientation cube.
Shawn Alan
[meteorite-list] Ad Announcing the Count cube Scale / Orientation cube
Starsinthedirt at aol.com Starsinthedirt at aol.com
Sun Mar 14 23
50 matches
Mail list logo