Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-25 Thread Francis Graham
> As I mentioned to the list in January, there was > absolutely nothing about > the NJO which resembled a new meteorite. I advised > the Newark Star Ledger, > The New York Times and AP in writing that the NJO > was not a meteorite. I > contacted the museum at Rutgers prior to their > exhibit

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-17 Thread epb471
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:49 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG Hi, Tracy, List No, that was the Illinois pseudo-meteorite: the BO, or Bloomington Object, not the NJO! The BO

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-16 Thread Adam Hupe
In my opinion which I have held from the beginning is that the NJO is probably something that got stuck to an aircraft wheel and dropped off when the landing gear was retracted during flight. It looked pretty scrapped up like something that had been run over several times and is weathered, somethin

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-16 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:12 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG I thought the woodchipper theory applied to the NJO as well? I agree that it does not appear to have features of an object that made a trip through out atmosphere (fusion crust,

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-14 Thread Sterling K. Webb
- From: tracy latimer To: Darryl Pitt ; Meteorite List Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 1:25 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG Hadn't the Occam's Razor explanation of this object been that it was part of a tub grinder ejected d

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-14 Thread tracy latimer
Hadn't the Occam's Razor explanation of this object been that it was part of a tub grinder ejected during operations while grinding up some dead trees several hundred yards away? They showed one of these babies in operation on the Discovery Channel several weeks ago, and I could easily believe

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-13 Thread Eric Twelker
? > Is there an indication of ablation? There would have to be, right? > It sure doesn't look like there is. > > They may be eating crow again... > > Cheers, > Pete > > > > > > From: Darryl Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Meteorite List > Sub

Re: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-13 Thread Pete Pete
sure doesn't look like there is. They may be eating crow again... Cheers, Pete From: Darryl Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Meteorite List Subject: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 06:26:42 -0400 It has finally been

[meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED METEORWRONG

2007-05-12 Thread Darryl Pitt
It has finally been determined by experts that the NJO is not a meteorite. In Friday's AP story, Rutgers University geologist Jerry Delaney was quoted as saying,"I was wrong. Sneaky little devil." The second sentiment is not even remotely accurate. As I mentioned to the list in January,