t; Adam
>
>
> From: John higgins
> To: "meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com" tral.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Auction Kings ( PROVENANCE COA's )
>
> Hi Mike, Adam, and List,
&g
there are a few errors in
the Bulletin so no system is perfect.
I hope this clears things up,
Kind Regards,
Adam
From: John higgins
To: "meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com"
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list
g great
> volumes of new meteorites, you more than make up for it in contributions you
> make elsewhere.
>
> Sincerely,
> John Higgins
>
> PS. I still am in support of standardization of provenance.
>
>
>
>
> From: Michael Gilmer
> To: Joh
_
From: Michael Gilmer
To: John higgins
Cc: "meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com"
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Auction Kings ( PROVENANCE COA's )
Hi John,
Some specimen cards or COA's would be easier to coun
me want to yell at the top of my lungs:
>
> SHOW SOME RESPECT FOR THE CULTURE AND THE SCIENCE!
>
> I urge other dealers to take the extra steps to advance our COA's together
> we can elevate meteorite collecting to the next level, and put our
> meteorites where they belong up on
Hi John and List,
I was not knocking any dealer's reputation, just expressing an opinion
about COA's in general. I think we are blurring the line here between
a specimen card and a COA. I like specimen cards. I am indifferent
towards COA's.
For example, you say that a meteorite from a well-kno
Hi Mike, Adam, and List,
Interesting opinions.
You guys touched on a major issue in the Meteorite Community, and there are
parts of your statements I don't agree with. I would really like to share how I
feel about the subject.
First of all Mike you said,
" I thought this was laughable for obv
7 matches
Mail list logo
