http://www.rocksfromspace.org/conceptionjunction.html
ROCKS FROM SPACE | METEORITES AND METEORITE HUNTERS
__
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@me
Hello List,
I came home today to find my specimen of Conception Junction and the
Monograph in my mail box.
Wow!
A beautifully prepared Pallasite and of course a well thought and well
put together description of the meteorite's history.
Once again, congratulation and job well done!
Thanks g
Martin:
Milton is unique in large part because of it's olivine
composition. I've taken Fig. 2 from the LPSC2003 abstract you
mention below and added a point (red) for Conception Junction (our analyses).
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/Conception_Junction_&_Milton.jpg
Milton is off by itself whe
11 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction approved (question)
Laurence,
Sorry if this is a stupid question but none of the other pallasites in the
bulletin show their data this same way.
looking at this data . What does it mean when it says;
mg/g etc...
Is this milligrams divide
Sent: Sun, Aug 28, 2011 11:32 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction approved (question)
Laurence,
Sorry if this is a stupid question but none of the other pallasites in
the
bulletin show their data this same way.
looking at this data . What does it mean when it says;
mg/g etc...
Is
Carl inquired:
"none of the other pallasites in the bulletin show their data
this same way. What does it mean when it says: mg/g etc."
This is milligrams per gram.
and:
"What would the percentage be put in a way that it
can be compared with the way others are reported?"
Well, like this:
Ni
Laurence,
Sorry if this is a stupid question but none of the other pallasites in the
bulletin show their data this same way.
looking at this data . What does it mean when it says;
mg/g etc...
Is this milligrams divided by grams?
What would the percentage be put in a way that it can be compared w
Interesting composition! Might this hint the meteorite may be extra solar? a
visitor from another star system? only time will tell!
Cheers
Steve Dunklee
--- On Sat, 8/27/11, Dave Gheesling wrote:
> From: Dave Gheesling
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] CONCEPTION JUNCTION, MISSOURI PAL
For those that are interested, Conception Junction was approved today.
see
www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=53877
Laurence
CMS
ASU
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Me
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Fowler
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 4:04 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: Michael Fowler
Subject: [meteorite-list] CONCEPTION JUNCTION, MISSOURI PALLASITE - AD/te
A new arrival: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=53877
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listin
Way to go, Karl, Dave, and Robert! That's great. A big congrats to you guys as
well!
Robert Woolard
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Karl Aston wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> Dave Gheesling, Robert Ward and I have introduced a new pallasite to
> the meteorite community:
> Conception
: Saturday, August 27, 2011 4:04 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: Michael Fowler
Subject: [meteorite-list] CONCEPTION JUNCTION, MISSOURI PALLASITE - AD/test
Wasson's statement that:
.there is no main-group pallasite that is closely related to Conception
Junction. Conception
Wasson's statement that:
…there is no main-group pallasite that is closely related to Conception
Junction. Conception Junction is unique."
leaves open the question at to what is the classification? Is it ungrouped, or
perhaps, main group anomalous?
I would be most interested to know the m
8377
--
From: "Karl Aston"
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 2:46 PM
To:
Subject: [meteorite-list] CONCEPTION JUNCTION, MISSOURI PALLASITE - AD/test
Dear List,
Dave Gheesling, Robert Ward and I have introduced a new pallasite to
the meteorite community:
Conception Junction, Missour
Great job, Karl, Rob and Dave. As usual you guys are always rockin' -
Meteor Rockin' that is!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Larry Atkins wrote:
>
> What a score for science, collectors, and the whole community!
>
> Fantastic job guys.
>
> Karl, you rock!!!
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Larry Atkin
What a score for science, collectors, and the whole community!
Fantastic job guys.
Karl, you rock!!!
Sincerely,
Larry Atkins
IMCA # 1941
Ebay alienrockfarm
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Met
Sorry if this is a double post but the first one doesn't seem to 'get through':
Hello Dave, Karl A., Dr. Wasson and list,
If the beautiful Conception Junction is 'unique' and not paired to any main
group pallasite (Dr. Wasson), could it in any way be paired
to the ungrouped pallasite MILTON, fou
Hello List and Karl,
Very cool, congratulations Karl, how many kilo's were recovered?
How many does that make for Missouri now?
Best,
Tim Heitz
- Original Message -
From: "Karl Aston"
To:
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 4:46 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] CONC
Congratulations, Dave, Robert and Karl
Superb Pallasite. It stands alone. Great science. I want one!
Regards,
Count Deiro
IMCA 3536
-Original Message-
>From: Karl Aston
>Sent: Aug 26, 2011 2:46 PM
>To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: [meteorite-list] CONCEPT
bonaceous type avalaible, a CM1 ?
A week to remember!
Kindest wishes
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Dave Gheesling
To: 'Bernd V. Pauli' ;
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 26, 2011 6:08 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction
Bernd, Michae
Dave kindly wrote:
"... not because the landowner wasn't credible, ..."
"... of course there are the findings of UCLA's Dr. John Wasson ..."
"... it was possible the stone was transported by a native American ..."
Hello Dave, Karl A., and List,
Just a short note to avoid misunderstandings!
O
Dave
-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Bernd V.
Pauli
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 1:49 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction
MichaelG. wrote:
"In
Dear List,
Dave Gheesling, Robert Ward and I have introduced a new pallasite to
the meteorite community:
Conception Junction, Missouri.
Information about North America's 20th pallasite can be found here:
www.conceptionjunctionpallasite.com
I was unable to post earlier due to incorrect email sett
Dave is not able to post at the moment, and rather than rewriting this I am
forwarding it for him. Obviously I had
concerns about specimen transport prior to acquiring the meteorite in
Conception Junction -- not because the landowner wasn't credible, but
Seems to me Intercourse Pennsylvania might be at least remotely related?
Haha
Michael Mulgrew wrote:
> Bernd and List,
>
> I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's
> Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "…there is no main-group
> pallasite th
Bernd and List,
I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's
Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "…there is no main-group
pallasite that is closely related to Conception Junction. Conception
Junction is unique."
Best,
Michael in so. Cal.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:49
MichaelG. wrote:
"In all seriousness, it is an attractive pallasite.
At first glance, it has a passing resemblance
to Brenham."
In all seriousness: not only at first glance does it look
like Brenham. It does look suspiciously like Brenham.
Maybe it is a transported Brenham mass!
Cheers,
Bern
Agreedwhat a truly terrific name. ;-) Congratulations KarlEveryone.
Best / Darryl
On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Mike Bandli wrote:
> A new American pallasite - Big news indeed! Congratulations to Karl on
> making such a great find for Missouri and for doing it the "old-schoo
29 matches
Mail list logo
