Given the ever increasing number of feature, which can be demonstrated not to be impact craters, that are being proclaimed to be impact craters, maybe it is time to start using the term “craterwrong”.
An example of one of these blatant “craterwrongs” can be seen in the You Tube presentation “End of an Era - Part 1 The Clovis impact” at: http://www.youtube.com/user/dredawgz1 Another set of craterwrongs can be seen in “Comets” at; http://www.atlantia.de/atlantis_english/myth/doom/atlantis_comets.htm and in the book, "The Secret of Atlantis", by Otto Muck at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/16206238/The-Secret-of-Atlantis-by-Otto-Muck The amazing aspect of the above craterwrongs is that the oceanic trenches and the bottoms of the Arctic Ocean being claimed to be impact craters even lack any sign of being circular features. It would seem that having some sort of circular (or even oval) feature would be the minimum, basic starting point for any such claims. Yours, Paul H. ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
