ently used classification scheme -
DivisionsJim Wooddell jimwooddell at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 20:39:50 EDT 2011
Previous message: [meteorite-list] Cassini Captures Ice Queen Helene
Next message: [meteorite-list] Currently used classification scheme
- Divisions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ threa
;
> [meteorite-list] Currently used classification scheme - DivisionsJim Wooddell
> jimwooddell at gmail.com
> Mon Jun 20 20:39:50 EDT 2011
>
>
> Previous message: [meteorite-list] Cassini Captures Ice Queen Helene
> Next message: [meteorite-list] Currently used classification
: [meteorite-list] Cassini Captures Ice Queen Helene
Next message: [meteorite-list] Currently used classification scheme - Divisions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all,
I am looking for some information in regards to the Division of
Meteorites in the currently
Thanks Jeff and Michael!
I had not seen David Weir's pageI see some new reading about to
happen here! Thank you for that. Quickly scanning over it, I do see
some new stuff I have not read before.
Jeff, your vote would make the process come full circle, in a way, as
I understand the first ever
I think the Weisberg divisions are by no means in general usage.
Meteorite classification is chaotic and there is no standard system. I
wrote most of the wikipedia article on this subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorite_classification
Take a look at the discussion there, which is fai
Hi all,
I am looking for some information in regards to the Division of
Meteorites in the currently used classification scheme.
It is my understanding that there are currently 3 divisions that all
meteorites fall underor at least at one time there were three.
Chondrites, Primitive Achondrites
6 matches
Mail list logo