I don't use ebay (I'm too stupid to figure it all out) so I have to
ask, is this auction over? Says Mar 31. Or? I would have thought
this one to go for more than the starting bid figure.
Mike
On Mar 31, 2008, at 10:35 PM, Jason Utas wrote:
I said:
The only slag that I've known to contain
I said:
> The only slag that I've known to contain olivine was Seymchan, and
> there's some debate as to whether that was actually waste, or, in
> fact, a synthetic meteorite look-alike meant to confuse buyers.
> The fact that the stone contains olivine means that either:
*Not "Seymchan," but rat
Mr EMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--=
--Ha ha Funny... the Rorschach-Shroom Techinque of meteorite
--identification...Down to confirming orange olivine crystals-- in a
--mesosiderite no less--and fresh? It is fresh from the slag pile!
--I've got petrified frog poop that looks
Hello Elton, All,
Hardly; I just think it's stupid to rule any sample out completely
without a lab analysis.
There's no single feature on the stone being auctioned that would
suggest that it is not, in fact, a fresh mesosiderite individual, and
seeing as I am as qualified as you, if not better, to
Ha ha Funny... the Rorschach-Shroom Techinque of meteorite
identification...Down to confirming orange olivine crystals-- in a
mesosiderite no less--and fresh? It is fresh from the slag pile!
I've got petrified frog poop that looks more like a meteorite then
this.
Pleeease...this is an early Apri
5 matches
Mail list logo
