But, since John de Lancie isn't handy:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/asteroid-deflection-tether/?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=feedutm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29
To Deflect an Asteroid, Try a Lasso, Not a Nuke
* By Adam Mann
*
...@charter.net wrote:
From: Darren Garrison cyna...@charter.net
Subject: [meteorite-list] Just change the gravitational constant of the
universe!
But, since John de Lancie isn't
handy:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/asteroid-deflection-tether/?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:24:37 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
Thought many sound interesting, if you discuss the issue with most of the
experts in the field, they'll pretty much all concede that the most likely
method to be used will be one or more nuclear weapons used in stand
off mode even if they
Hi Darren, All,
Since it's nearly impossible to do the KYAGB manuever yourself, maybe figuring
a plan on getting acquainted with a super model instead. Best way to go, I
think.
Carl
Darren wrote:
I'll have to disagree with the experts there-- I think the most likely and
viable approach is
4 matches
Mail list logo