: Thursday, April 21, 2005 6:39 pm
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Largest collection criteria
I'd like to think that I have a fairly good-sized collection from
sheer
diversity, despite the fact that almost none of my collection is
larger than
5 grams. I have over 150 unique falls or finds
I'd think that if you are speaking of the largest, you'd
have to measure the volume of the collection. I'd think a
stone slightly bigger than a similar size iron would be
considered the larger of the two. That could be
problematic though, so you could use the weight of two
collections with
-list] Largest collection criteria
I'd think that if you are speaking of the largest, you'd
have to measure the volume of the collection. I'd think a
stone slightly bigger than a similar size iron would be
considered the larger of the two. That could be
problematic though, so you could use
latimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2005 6:39 pm
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Largest collection criteria
I'd like to think that I have a fairly good-sized collection from
sheer
diversity, despite the fact that almost none of my collection is
larger than
5 grams. I have
4 matches
Mail list logo