Thank you to all who answered. Your replies were very helpful.
-- Michael
Michael Doran
Fort Worth, TX
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019, 11:06:19 PM CDT, Michael Doran
wrote:
As a newbie, I've come to rely pretty heavily on the Meteoritical Bulletin
database for information about particular
: Michael Doran via Meteorite-list
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 13, 2019 10:07 pm
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite reclassification questions
As a newbie, I've come to rely pretty heavily on the Meteoritical Bulletin
database for information about particular meteorites
When I initially classified Ningqiang, there were no known CKs. We
classified it as CV3 because that was the closest group, but we noted that
its refractory lithophile element abundances didn't match CV that well.
Later, when we defined the CK group, it became obvious that Ningqiang was
more like
Hi Michael,
I am sure someone with more expertise will chime in, but I can think
of two different things that lead to a meteorite being "reclassified".
By "reclassified", I assume you mean being published in the Met
Bulletin. This can happen when there is a change in nomenclature or an
error was
-Original Message-
From: Michael Doran via Meteorite-list
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 13, 2019 10:07 pm
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite reclassification questions
As a newbie, I've come to rely pretty heavily on the Meteoritical Bulletin
database
As a newbie, I've come to rely pretty heavily on the Meteoritical Bulletin
database for information about particular meteorites as well as to look at
aggregate data for different types.
I've been somewhat surprised to discover that it is not unusual for meteorites
to get reclassified and I
6 matches
Mail list logo
