Re: [meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE

"defined" in their classification. Thanks and Best Wishes Michael Cottingham -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:59 AM To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: [meteorite-lis

Re: [meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE

Hi Bernd, My thoughts exactly. I bought a slice from Michael and there were so many chondrules and broken fragments in the matrix, it made me wonder how it could be classified as an L6. Bob On 19 Feb 2008 18:58:45 UT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, ... > > . and especially those who alre

[meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE

Hello All, ... . and especially those who already own (Don Edwards, for example) or have purchased pieces from M.C. My three Bath Furnace specimens (2.56 + 0.38 + 0.37 grams) arrived today and after my first quick look at them under the micoscope at 8x mag. I almost believe that a reclassification

Re: [meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE meteorite

Hello Bernd and all, Just returned from Tucson late yesterday and am catching up on email. Bernd is right about Bath Furnace, it is a very interesting witnessed fall. So I thought I'd add a bit more to the story. The following link is to an image of a Bath Furnace part slice from Al Lang's web

[meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE meteorite

Hello Meteorite Folks, I'd like to draw your attention to a highly historical US American meteorite, a witnessed fall with many appealing details, anecdotes, and characteristics! http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?sofocus=bs&sbrftog=1&dfsp=1&catref=C12&frpp=25&from=R10&satitle=Bath+Furnace&