Hello Martin and List. According to Wasson and Kallemeyn (2002)
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 66, No. 13, pp. 2445–2473.
"The members of the Mundrabilla duo, Waterville (1.63) and Mundrabilla
(1.64), are FeS-rich irons, closely related to each other in structure
and composition. They a
uot;David Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Altmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question
> Hello List,
>
> My source from which I formed my opinion is the paper by J. T
Hello List,
My source from which I formed my opinion is the paper by J. T. Wasson
and G. W. Kallemeyn, "The IAB iron-meteorite complex: A group, five
subgroups, numerous grouplets, closely related, mainly formed by crystal
segregation in rapidly cooling melts", which was published in Geochimica
Oviously David Weir's answer didn't made it through and because most have it
listed as Iranom or IIICD:
"Hello Martin,
In my opinion it is best described at this point in time as
Iron, IAB complex, Mundrabilla duo
Regards,
David"
__
Meteorite-list ma
Hello Martin,
In my opinion it is best described at this point in time as
Iron, IAB complex, Mundrabilla duo
Regards,
David
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Salü list,
in painting my specimen chits, I ask myself, how to denominate Mundrabilla
correctly.
Old Catalogue has simply "IRANOM", 2000er Grady Catalogue says "IIICD" and
"anomalous",
now with the finer Au-stuff and the subgroups, I read, that Mundrabilla and
Waterville are close to sLL.
Shall I
6 matches
Mail list logo
