http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-investigates-meteorite-claims/story-e6frg1ac-1225837470139
Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
SCIENTISTS investigating claims a meteor fragment the size of a cricket ball
collided into a WA house have confirmed it was
of the state in Australia?
Shawn Alan
eBayShop
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=&_trksid=p4340
[meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not meteorite'
Martin Altmann altmann at meteorite-martin.de
Wed Apr 14 12:47:57
responsible for what damages the meteorite fall might cause, if
its physical or psychological in my opinion... Its their property.
Shawn Alan
eBayshop
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=&_trksid=p4340
[meteorite-list] Museum investigat
om
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
Kuyken
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
An: meteorite list
Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/special-features/museum-inves
pointI had to laugh at that one!
Greg
> From: altm...@meteorite-martin.de
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:29:58 +0200
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably
ntral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
> Kuyken
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2010 16:35
> An: meteorite list
> Betreff: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
> meteorite'
>
> http://www.perth
caused by a property of the state,
>> wouldn't it?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
>> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jeff
>> Kuyken
>
terling K. Webb
-
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; "Martin Altmann"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,
not meteorite'
Interesting thought Martin...
I wonder what their position would be re
and becomes the Property of The State.
>
> No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> -
> - Original Message - From:
> To: ; "Martin Altmann"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13,
> dog. Then, on the bounce, it touches the
> > Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
> >
> > No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
> >
> >
> > Sterling K. Webb
> >
> -----------------
> > - Original Message - From:
> > To: ;
> "Ma
he bounce, it touches the
> > Earth and becomes the Property of The State.
> >
> > No harm, no fault. Hand it over, please.
> >
> >
> > Sterling K. Webb
> > ---------------------
> > - Original Message
>>...and it becomes a meteorite at instant incandescence ends.<<
I've been saying this for years and met resistance every foot of the way.
geozay
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mail
teorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
meteorite'
Any lawyer could argue his way out of this
dilema with one simple slip. The "meteorite,"
while falling, is a meteoroid, not a meteorite,
hence it is under God's jurisdiction.
You, your car, your house, your dead dog
(
Chris
*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Kowalski"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite&
terling K. Webb
-
- Original Message -
From: "Yinan Wang"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'
"Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
The State
In a message dated 4/13/2010 4:29:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
veom...@gmail.com writes:
"Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Property of
The State."
So if a meteoroid embeds itself into your car, or you catch it before
it hits the ground (ya, improbable as it seems),
tecentral.com] Im Auftrag von
cdtuc...@cox.net
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. April 2010 00:09
An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; Yinan Wang
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
meteorite'
After a quick Google and Looking at all of the definitions of
@meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:26:46 -0500
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
> meteorite'
>
> Well, if The State had used the "touched the
> Earth" argument to weasel out of State liability
&
eteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
> meteorite'
>
> In a message dated 4/13/2010 4:29:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> veom...@gmail.com writes:
> "Then, on the bounce, it touches the Earth and becomes the Pr
rite-martin.de; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: RE: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
meteorite'
dear meteorite hunters. iwork as a prison guard and on 9july09 940pm i was
hit in the head by a bean sized and shaped stone, it is golden in color with
small clear st
Steve,
This St. louis Meteorite is interesting. What if the car had been driving on
private land? As discussed previously on this list, this should be referred to
in the Lorton Court Case. As that meteorite also never did hit actual Earth. It
hit legally rented space and was found in much the
Carl, All,
I wouldn't equate it at all to the pole analogy, because...well, it's
different. The pole is already owned by someone to begin with.
You can't really argue that, if I hit a pole with my car, I will gain
the right to own it. Even if my car is parked and a telephone pole
falls on it, t
Jason Utas wrote:
> Carl, All,
>
> I wouldn't equate it at all to the pole analogy, because...well, it's
> different. The pole is already owned by someone to begin with.
THERE YOU GO AGAIN! NOBODY WANTS THE POLE JASON. USING MY ANALOGY IT WOULD BE
THE CAR OWNERSHIP THAT IS IN QUESTION
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Jason
Utas
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. April 2010 19:53
An: Meteorite-list
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
me
OU SAY A DIFFERENT SITUATION. .
I mean, by what you've been saying all along, if it never hit the
ground, it wouldn't be a "meteorite"...so maybe I should get angry and
just reply to you using all caps and only address your dictional
inconsistency and lack of clarity/misuse of termin
an "act of God."
Greg S.
> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:15:13 -0700
> From: photoph...@yahoo.com
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock, not
> meteorite'
>
> Hello
ral.com] Im Auftrag von Jason
Utas
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2010 00:11
An: Meteorite-list
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'
To limit posts, Martin's is responded to above, Carl's, below:
> "If I pick anything
otmail.com
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Museum investigation: 'Probably a rock,not
meteorite'
Hello Greg and Listers,
Great point that you brought up about the "Act of God" ruling but my
question wasn't about rain or hail, my
28 matches
Mail list logo
