Jeff's comment about a contiuous but changing composition range of eucrites to diogenites with Howardites in the middle made me also think that the answer to Stan's question the other day when he was asking about his diogenite pieces that look the same but one has vesicles. Could it just be that the fall that generated those pieces was from a chunk of diogenite that was at a transition zone close to a magam gas release that created the vesicles in some of the material, but not in all of it. Sound like cool stuff Stan.
my main question actually wasnt really about the fact that I have a diogenite with vessicals (something that is aparently undescribed in the literature) but rather the fact that I have a diogenite that is uniformally vessiculated throughout the stone. other stones from this find show no signs of vessicals. It just doesnt seem plausible to me that the same parent meteoriod would produce 1 stone totally vessiculated and a bunch that were not. the stones were all found within a stone's throw of each other, all have the same miro and macroscopic apearance, and are unbrecciated monomict diogenites... not exactly a common class of meteorite, so if this stuff ISNT the same material, it would be akin to finding two unrelated CI stones sitting right next to each other (and I'm NOT talking about finding such inside a dealers displaycase! :) ).
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
