are interested in, is it not?
Sterling K. Webb
--
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Langbroek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sterling K. Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "meteorite list"
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Re: Comet: Talkin
Sterling K. Webb wrote:
Marco says, "What we are talking about here is
a significant flux of large meteoroids entering our
atmosphere and creating airbursts (given the lack
of impact craters), if this theory is correct."
This, of course is exactly what I was NOT
talking about, was in fac
> analysis,
> we don't simply dissect 1000's of feet of core atom
> by atom to find everything in there. We go in and
> look
> for what we believe we might find and to look for
> that
> only. We analyze gas in bubbles and ignore
> everything
> else, if that
ffect of all.
Sterling K. Webb
-----------------
- Original Message -
From: "E.P. Grondine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Re: Comet: Talking P
Hi Marco, all -
The lack of results from the new Europen Greenland ice
cores is disturbing, given the gross physical remains
from impacts of fragments of Comet Encke, the
contemporary text accounts of climate collapses, and
the tree ring evidence.
--- Marco Langbroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Sterling, did you ever see a cosmic dust particle under the microscope, let
alone have you searched for them?
I did. I searched for and found cosmic spherules in sediment samples from an
archaeological excavation. (you see: I like experimentation too. When the
results of the SEM investigation o
6 matches
Mail list logo
