[meteorite-list] Re: The Pribram/Neuschwanstein Meteoroid Stream Is Not Dead

2002-09-28 Thread Herbert Raab
E.P. Grondine writes: > It's the time BEFORE the LPBE, the sizes of the parent > bodies, and the mechanisms of their formation and > differentiation. This is, of course, true. I was referring to the orbits of the meteorids, which are perturbed by the planets (mostly Jupiter), and their current

[meteorite-list] Re: The Pribram/Neuschwanstein Meteoroid Stream Is Not Dead

2002-09-27 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi Herb - I probably should have expressed this a different way. It's the time BEFORE the LPBE, the sizes of the parent bodies, and the mechanisms of their formation and differentiation. thanks much anyway, and all the best, ep --- Herbert Raab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > E.P. Grondine

[meteorite-list] Re: The Pribram/Neuschwanstein Meteoroid Stream Is Not Dead

2002-09-24 Thread Herbert Raab
E.P. Grondine writes: > I suppose that ultimately this may all go back to > whether or not Jupiter occupied its current orbit > before the LPBE (Late Period Bombarment Event) - my > guess is that it did not. As far as I can say, the location of Jupiter's orbit during the Late Heavy Bombardment

[meteorite-list] Re: The Pribram/Neuschwanstein Meteoroid Stream Is Not Dead

2002-09-24 Thread E.P. Grondine
I suppose that ultimately this may all go back to whether or not Jupiter occupied its current orbit before the LPBE (Late Period Bombarment Event) - my guess is that it did not. ep --- Herbert Raab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark Fox writes: > > In theory then, a collision-formed stream of