Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Meteorites USA
I would say that's a good one too simply because it's a crater maker. Craters are cool... ;) Regards, Eric On 12/31/2009 5:15 PM, cdtuc...@cox.net wrote: Jeff, List, Good list but, I would have to squeeze Carancas in there somewhere. Very few meteorites have posed as many questions while at

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread cdtucson
Jeff, List, Good list but, I would have to squeeze Carancas in there somewhere. Very few meteorites have posed as many questions while at the same time providing many new answers. Too many to list here but it has all the bells and whistles to go along with the Scientific interests. Carl --

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Galactic Stone & Ironworks
Hi Folks, Yeah, I was being arbitrary in my observations to that list. It did generate some fun and useful discussion, so the writer(s) succeeded on that count. :) About ALH 84001 - When NASA made that infamous press conference announcement back in 1996, there were some strong questions about t

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Darryl Pitt
Not so fast!! The list provided by the Science Channel was surely the result of tremendous consideration and is BRILLIANT and SPOT ON(and the Macovich Collection's control of the largest privately owned specimens of #3, #7 and #8 is purely coincidental ;-) Seriously? The Science

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Jason Utas
Hello Eric, All, I would disagree. Since we really don't know what made those features, you're simply dealing with little inorganic structures that science says are similar to those made by organisms on Earth. You can hype them up in the media until the cows come home, and wish for life on Mars un

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Meteorites USA
Mike, List, Perhaps the point of the Top Ten list is not to make a Top Ten list at all, but rather a conversation piece and publicity generating article simply to gain traffic. I mean we are after all speaking about it at length and have done so in the past as well... @Jason - In regards to

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Jason Utas
Hello Mike, On the contrary, Orguiel is a CI1, and is thus one of the most primitive pieces of matter on the planet. It hasn't experienced temperatures above about 200C - and contains a multitude of complex organic molecules, just like Murchison. The only reason more work hasn't been done on it i

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Linton Rohr
t;> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:37 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time My top 10 most important meteorites of the last 250 years, off the top of my head, in alphabetical order - Allan Hills A81005 Allan Hills 84001 Allende C

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Jeff Grossman
My top 10 most important meteorites of the last 250 years, off the top of my head, in alphabetical order - Allan Hills A81005 Allan Hills 84001 Allende Canyon Diablo Elephant Moraine A79001 L'Aigle Murchison Orgueil Semarkona Siena Peekskill, Sylacauga, Willamette and Hoba aren't even close, an

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Meteorites USA
My point was not that we all disagree on the list, but rather the seemingly misplaced importance of the discovery of another life form from another planet and that that evidence was found in a meteorite. In my opinion, that trumps any other meteorite that has even been discovered. Regards, Eri

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Galactic Stone & Ironworks
Hi Eric and List, An interesting little presentation, but I don't agree with some of the entries on the list. Let's start from #10 and work our way to the top. #10 - Allende. Allende certainly belongs on the list, but I think it may merit a higher rank than #10. #9 - Murchison. This one also

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Meteorites USA
Hi Jason, I agree and realize the "Top Lists" have been discussed, but my point was not about that or Willamette, or Hoba, or large meteorites at all. I was stating in my opinion that the #1 meteorite of ALL TIME should be the one in which another life form not from Earth is discovered. Isn't

Re: [meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Jason Utas
Hello Eric, All, We covered this on the list a while back - making such a list is pointless, because it depends on the criteria being most valued - current scientific importance, historical scientific importance, popular interest, historical value, aesthetics, or whatever else you deem important. T

[meteorite-list] Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites Of All Time

2009-12-31 Thread Meteorites USA
Hi All, Did anyone read the Science Channel's Top Ten Meteorites of All Time list? http://science.discovery.com/top-ten/2009/meteors/meteors.html My article on MeteoriteBlog.com http://meteoriteblog.com/top-ten-meteorites-of-all-time-science-channel/ Opinions? Regards, Eric Wichman Meteorite