Re: [meteorite-list] Seeking Knowledge and Dealing with Meteorwrong Owners was Classification Q

2006-05-23 Thread Pete Pete
arcastic. No gauntlet has been dropped. We're having a discussion. I only wanted to set the record straight. Cheers, Pete From: E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Pete Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Seeki

Re: [meteorite-list] Seeking Knowledge and Dealing with Meteorwrong Owners was Classification Q

2006-05-23 Thread Norm Lehrman
Elton and all, Well said. I too have been holding back on this subject, but I agree strongly that to send a certain meteor-wrong in to be examined by our small and over-taxed group of classifiers is unconscionable. The vision rock is a nice rock and has value as a landscape boulder. Most of the

Re: [meteorite-list] Seeking Knowledge and Dealing with Meteorwrong Owners was Classification Q

2006-05-23 Thread E J
Hello Gary, Pete, List I've held back discussing this again as I am not the one on the "vision quest". However, you've raised the issue of getting this classified aka lab tested--at a meteorite lab amongst other things. You think he can sell this for a sum and rebuild his failing ministry. He'll