Hello all
The Dr.Hill of the University of Tucson - Lunar and
Planetary Laboratory - is making a study on the
acapulcoites ones, in fact it has demanded also a
piece of my NWA 1058 in order to make comparisons.
Regards
Matteo
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/2/2002 9:24:36
...
Best regards,
Norbert
-Original Message-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von fcressy
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2002 06:08
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John Divelbiss
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Tafassasset classification
Hi John and all,
I
Norbert,
Thank you...awesome response.
John
- Original Message -
From: Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Tafassasset classification
Norbert Classen modestly wrote:
Now, I
Svend wrote:
J. Zipfel from the MPI in Mainz says that refractory lithophiles
fractionated compared to a typical CR composition is leading to
a possible classification as primitive achondrite. Does anybody
know about a final classification yet?
Hello Anne, Svend and List,
In the Abstract
Hello all
Another paired is probably Grein 004
Regards
Matteo
--- Norbert Classen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bernd, Svend, Anne, and List,
I discussed this subject several times with my old
friend Dr. Otto,
the German researcher who did the original analysis
on Tafassasset
Hi Matteo, hi List,
Grein 004 as well as Tenere 001 are just synonyms for the
Tafassasset Freiburg mass, a single stone weighing 3610 grams.
It's no pairing. Just to avoid further confusion...
Best,
Norbert
-Original Message-
Hello all
Another paired is probably Grein 004
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:30 PM
Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] Tafassasset classification
Hello Bernd, Svend, Anne, and List,
I discussed this subject several times with my old friend Dr. Otto,
the German researcher who did the original analysis on Tafassasset
(Freiburg), a stone
Buhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tafassasset classification
Hello All,
Primitive is primitive!Help me to understand the differences
please.
Is the argument about where the line(s) should be drawn
]; Bernd Pauli HD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Svend Buhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tafassasset classification
Hello All,
Primitive is primitive!Help me to understand the differences
please
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Svend Buhl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tafassasset classification
Frank,
I understand the description of the primitive achondrite...including the
types you
In a message dated 10/2/2002 9:24:36 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand the description of the primitive achondrite...including the
types you mention.
From that statement in Nortons book, they are still chondrites...just
overdone a bit. What line did they cross to
11 matches
Mail list logo