Re: [meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough? (Diregard Previous Post)

2010-03-14 Thread Paul Heinrich
cdtuc...@cox.net wrote: >Interesting points here. >Falls a bit outside of the field of meteoritics but, still a >fair use for old strewnfield co-ords. >I wonder Paul. Has this data ever been used in such a way? I do not know of meteorite strew fields being used this way specifically. However, th

Re: [meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough? (Diregard Previous Post)

2010-03-14 Thread Mark Bowling
ist ; Paul Heinrich Sent: Sun, March 14, 2010 10:03:23 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough? (Diregard Previous Post) Paul, Interesting points here. Falls a bit outside of the field of meteoritics but, still a fair use for old strewnfield co-ords. I wonder

Re: [meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough? (Diregard Previous Post)

2010-03-14 Thread cdtucson
Paul, Interesting points here. Falls a bit outside of the field of meteoritics but, still a fair use for old strewnfield co-ords. I wonder Paul. Has this data ever been used in such a way? I can think of one example that this theory sorta works with. As far as I know there has only been two plac

[meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough? (Diregard Previous Post)

2010-03-13 Thread Paul Heinrich
Please disregard my previous post as the bottom part of it was chopped off when I sent it Eric wrote: "Meteorite fragments found on dry lake beds or anywhere on "old ground", do in fact move. In my opinion coordinate data is still valuable, but not as valuable as say data from a fresh meteorite