[meteorite-list] Classification question

I have some material I would like to get officially classified and given a name, can someone direct me to the right person/place? It is really interesting material and all my previous posts about this here have gone unreplied to... Thanks, Greg

Re: [meteorite-list] Classification question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:05 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Classification question I have some material I would like to get officially classified and given a name, can someone direct me to the right person/place? It is really

Re: [meteorite-list] Classification question

Thanks, I have talked with Ted Bunch and will be sending a sample him. Greg --- On Wed, 11/5/08, Dr. Svend Buhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dr. Svend Buhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Classification question To: Meteorite Mailing List meteorite-list

[meteorite-list] classification question

List, I'd like some clarification on L versus LL and on 3-5 versus 3/5. Also is there a corresponding H versus HH classification? If I can ever get the chondrites together my next challange will be the Irons. Thanks in advance. Jerry Flaherty __

Re: AW: WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question

Jörn Koblitz wrote: Correct. It simply mean that no finer classification has been done. It's just a bit more work to get the subtype classification. A 3.0 is actually the most primitive, most unequilibrated and rarest type of unequilibrated ordinary chondrite. BTW: A petrologic type 2

Re: AW: WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question

Not gonna happen. The types-1 and -2 designations are archaic, even for carbonaceous chondrites. The problem is that some type 3's are aqueously altered and some type 2's are thermally metamorphosed. This is what happens when you use one digit to signify two variables. Since the type 3.0-6

AW: WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question

to any ordinary chondrite. Only to carbonaceous chondrites. Jörn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nicholas Gessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Mai 2004 02:30 An: Jörn Koblitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question While

Re: WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question

] Betreff: [meteorite-list] Classification question Hello to the List ! I've got a (stupid ?) question about the classification of the chondrites. What is the difference between this kind of classification : For example L3.6, L3-6 or H5/6 Is the sign - the same as / or . in this case

[meteorite-list] Classification question

Hi Nick, While we're at it, what's the difference between a 3 and a 3.0? Does a 3 imply that no one made any finer discrimination? That's always been my understanding. Or does a 3 imply that it's really a 3.0? Definitely not -- particularly given how rare 3.0's are. --Rob

[meteorite-list] Classification question

Hello to the List ! I've got a (stupid ?) question about the classification of the chondrites. What is the difference between this kind of classification : For example L3.6, L3-6 or H5/6 Is the sign - the same as / or . in this case ? Thanks a lot, Pierre

Re: [meteorite-list] Classification question

. Please listmembers correct me if I am wrong I dont have my books here so I may be incorrect in some parts. Best wishes Lars Pedersen - Original Message - From: Pierre-Marie PELE [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:14 AM Subject: [meteorite-list

WG: [meteorite-list] Classification question

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Pierre-Marie PELE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 08:15 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [meteorite-list] Classification question Hello to the List ! I've got a (stupid ?) question about the classification of the chondrites. What