> > > > I think that asking John would fall to you, or
> at
> > > > least a buyer.
> > > > I'm just curious to know why it hasn't been
> > > > submitted yet.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jason
>
; > And Mike, it seems as if we've finally hit on
> > > > something we disagree on -
> > > > I didn't buy any piece of the meteorite, nor
> did I
> > > > buy/sell the entire mass.
> > > > I think that asking John would fall to you, or
>
> >
>
http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/metbull.php?sea=havana&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&phot=&pnt=no&code=11857
> > >
> > > Regards,
&
amp;phot=&pnt=no&code=11857
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
> > > To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>
v/meteor/metbull.php?sea=havana&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&phot=&pnt=no&code=11857
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Or
com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on illinois irons
>
> Hello Bill, All,
> You should read what you post - check the references section of your
> link and you get:
>
> Never published in the Meteoritical Bulletin
> Find references in NASA ADS
>
> Haha, d
ode=11857
Regards,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on illinois irons
>
> Hello Again All, Steve,
> Well, you're..
Regards,
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
> > > To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correct
Jason, you are friends with John Wasson, he has had
Fredericksburg in his possesion for more than five
years.
Perhaps you could ask him why he refuses to submit it.
Michael Farmer
--- Jason Utas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Again All, Steve,
> Well, you're...kind ofright.
> Most people
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind ofright.
Most people wouldn't qualify Havana as a meteorite, seeing as all
that's known of it is a few little indian beads made out of meteoric
iron. Yes, it's true, they did turn out to have a different chemical
composition than any known iron, but
Thank you Steve for that cogent analysis. I'll try to
not assume facts which are not in evidence.
As to understanding the math I totally agree. I
remember a time when "one ad a day for a week plus
addemdums"( sometimes 2 per day) still equaled one ad
per week. Must be that new darn math.
Elton
Hello list and good evening.Being from illinois and
having been to 3 of the state strewfields,there are
already 3 iron meteorites classified already in
illinois.HAVANA (IIICD),SAINT AUGUSTINE (IID),and
finally WOODBINE (IAB).So if this was to be the next
iron from illinois,it would be the FOURTH.3+
12 matches
Mail list logo
