The word apparent double standard would apply here. If you feel it is ok
to
pick numbers at random for additional finds when it comes to NWA and not
others, why is this not happening with the Antarctic, Sahara, DAGs, SAUs
and
Dhofars?
just for the sake of clarity, i dont think this is a problem
o: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Hello Adam, Stan and List. Adam-I think you missed the point that Stan
and I we
>object strongly when it comes to rare material.
> >
> >All the best,
> >
> >Adam
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "John Birdsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o rare material.
All the best,
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "John Birdsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "stan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough,
53 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
> Hello Stan and List. Yes, this was exactly the point that we made in an
> earlier posting (The Probem with Reductionism ad Infinitum). The
> members of this list have not yet received any response from Adam on
&
Hello Stan and List. Yes, this was exactly the point that we made in an
earlier posting (The Probem with Reductionism ad Infinitum). The
members of this list have not yet received any response from Adam on
this matter and we wonder if he or anyone else have a reasonable
explanation for this a
Regarding the different procedure for e.g. NWA / Gao-Guenie - this issue
was addressed
in an email by Jeff Grossman dated Sept. 9, 2004 (see below).
Gao-Guenie can be treated like Allende or Holbrook in this context as it
doesn't apply to areas of dense meteorite concentration.
but what about
7 matches
Mail list logo
