Martin:
Milton is unique in large part because of it's olivine
composition. I've taken Fig. 2 from the LPSC2003 abstract you
mention below and added a point (red) for Conception Junction (our analyses).
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/Conception_Junction_&_Milton.jpg
Milton is off by itself whe
11 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction approved (question)
Laurence,
Sorry if this is a stupid question but none of the other pallasites in the
bulletin show their data this same way.
looking at this data . What does it mean when it says;
mg/g etc...
Is this milligrams divide
Sent: Sun, Aug 28, 2011 11:32 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction approved (question)
Laurence,
Sorry if this is a stupid question but none of the other pallasites in
the
bulletin show their data this same way.
looking at this data . What does it mean when it says;
mg/g etc...
Is
Laurence,
Sorry if this is a stupid question but none of the other pallasites in the
bulletin show their data this same way.
looking at this data . What does it mean when it says;
mg/g etc...
Is this milligrams divided by grams?
What would the percentage be put in a way that it can be compared w
Interesting composition! Might this hint the meteorite may be extra solar? a
visitor from another star system? only time will tell!
Cheers
Steve Dunklee
--- On Sat, 8/27/11, Dave Gheesling wrote:
> From: Dave Gheesling
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] CONCEPTION JUNCTION, MISSOURI PAL
I released it just now:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=53877
Jeff
On 8/27/2011 7:50 PM, Dave Gheesling wrote:
Michael& All,
Dr. Wasson submitted his classification of the Conception Junction pallasite
(PMG) to the Nomenclature Committee last month, and presumably it will be
Way to go, Karl, Dave, and Robert! That's great. A big congrats to you guys as
well!
Robert Woolard
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Karl Aston wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> Dave Gheesling, Robert Ward and I have introduced a new pallasite to
> the meteorite community:
> Conception
Michael & All,
Dr. Wasson submitted his classification of the Conception Junction pallasite
(PMG) to the Nomenclature Committee last month, and presumably it will be
posted to the Meteorite Bulletin before long. Since much of this
information is not publicly available at the moment, please find b
Hi Karl I must say great find on the new pallasite to you & all your team.
Scott Johnson
U.S. AirBorne Sport Aviation LLC
Eagles Nest Airpark
Sport Pilot C.F.I WSC-L WSC-S
www.usairborne.com
i...@usairborne.com
Office 509-780-0554
Cell 509-780-8377
Great job, Karl, Rob and Dave. As usual you guys are always rockin' -
Meteor Rockin' that is!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Larry Atkins wrote:
>
> What a score for science, collectors, and the whole community!
>
> Fantastic job guys.
>
> Karl, you rock!!!
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Larry Atkin
Sorry if this is a double post but the first one doesn't seem to 'get through':
Hello Dave, Karl A., Dr. Wasson and list,
If the beautiful Conception Junction is 'unique' and not paired to any main
group pallasite (Dr. Wasson), could it in any way be paired
to the ungrouped pallasite MILTON, fou
Congratulations, Dave, Robert and Karl
Superb Pallasite. It stands alone. Great science. I want one!
Regards,
Count Deiro
IMCA 3536
-Original Message-
>From: Karl Aston
>Sent: Aug 26, 2011 2:46 PM
>To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: [meteorite-list] CONCEPTION JUNCTION,
bonaceous type avalaible, a CM1 ?
A week to remember!
Kindest wishes
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Dave Gheesling
To: 'Bernd V. Pauli' ;
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 26, 2011 6:08 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Conception Junction
Bernd, Michae
Bernd, Michael G., & All,
I see that Robert got a draft of this note out earlier, but I've added a
little more detail here as well. Michael M. hit on part of this in his
post, but you raised a reasonable question that we're happy to address.
Obviously we had concerns about specimen transport p
Seems to me Intercourse Pennsylvania might be at least remotely related?
Haha
Michael Mulgrew wrote:
> Bernd and List,
>
> I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's
> Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "…there is no main-group
> pallasite th
Bernd and List,
I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's
Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "…there is no main-group
pallasite that is closely related to Conception Junction. Conception
Junction is unique."
Best,
Michael in so. Cal.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:49
16 matches
Mail list logo
