On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:40:52 +0100, you wrote:
>Thanks Darren
>
>Good article. Although I will share later tonight a serious scientific
>not much known study about water dowsing.
Or this?
http://www.csicop.org/si/9901/dowsing.html
__
http://www.meteori
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:40:52 +0100, you wrote:
>Thanks Darren
>
>Good article. Although I will share later tonight a serious scientific
>not much known study about water dowsing.
Is it this?
http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/02/24/debunking-dowsing/
___
Thanks Darren
Good article. Although I will share later tonight a serious scientific
not much known study about water dowsing.
Michael B, France
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Garrison"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iridium (+ Osmium ? +
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:55:35 +0100, you wrote:
>It just shows how naive I am about metal detection ! I never used one...
>
I remember as a kid seeing ads in the back of magazines for this thing that you
drop a sample of anything into, and then it points out the location of more of
it-- be it gold
Thanks Darren and Elton
It just shows how naive I am about metal detection ! I never used one...
But I am surprised that my post didn't get more response, as well as the
ones from Darren
that I mentioned in my first post:
1- "Possible Ohio crater" in Apr. 2005: not one response to it !
Anothe
Hello Darren The original post never made it to my mail box. To the original
posters questions about metal detectors:
One of the points to be made is that a metal detector only detects free metal
not elements. It is a "field test" and searching for specific elements is a
"lab test'
As the
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 03:25:05 +0100, you wrote:
>A- measuring on the field/ meteorite finding/ first testing:
>I read often that finders/hunters use magnets. What about a metal detector
>measuring Iridium ?
>or is Iridium detection too close to other elements, or too small in content
>to be singl
7 matches
Mail list logo
