Re: Question about spam mode

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Carl S. Gutekunst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now, I do not know if there is an RFC documenting In-Reply-To. >> Pointers welcome. I've relied on my experience with it since '88/89 >> when I first starting using email. > >RFC822. > > "In-Reply-To" ":" *(phr

Re: Question about spam mode

> Now, I do not know if there is an RFC documenting In-Reply-To. > Pointers welcome. I've relied on my experience with it since '88/89 > when I first starting using email. RFC822. "In-Reply-To" ":" *(phrase / msg-id) "References"":" *(phrase / msg-id) That is, t

Re: Question about spam mode

On August 9, 2000 at 14:00, "SysAdmin, dte.net" wrote: > I've noticed when is enabled, the 'Reply-To' address is X'ed out, > but not the 'In-Reply-To' address. I have a chaser script that I run > occasionally to remove ALL email addresses anyway, but I was wondering why > doesn't take care of '

Question about spam mode

Hi all, I've noticed when is enabled, the 'Reply-To' address is X'ed out, but not the 'In-Reply-To' address. I have a chaser script that I run occasionally to remove ALL email addresses anyway, but I was wondering why doesn't take care of 'In-Reply-To'. Many Thanks, Manuel Alvarez P.S. You ca