>> I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
>> performance problems.
>
>>Was there a difference?
I think so, although there were a lot of other things making the
determination unclear. For starters: A near full filesystem, a runaway
process consuming one of the CPU's, co
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Earl Hood wrote:
> You can regen the index file by doing something like the following:
>
> mhonarc -editidx -nomsgpgs ...
>
I guess this answers the question in my last post.
On November 10, 2001 at 00:04, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> >Version v2.5 avoids this problem since HEADER and FOOTER resources
> >are no longer supported.
>
> I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
> performance problems.
Was there a difference?
> In fact, the time seq
>Version v2.5 avoids this problem since HEADER and FOOTER resources
>are no longer supported.
I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
performance problems.
In fact, the time sequence went like this:
1) 2.4.9 + 2.5.0 config
2) 2.4.9 + 2.5.0 config
3) 2.5.0 + 2
