Karel,
I updated MICO from darcs and compiled with and without threads enabled.
(I had to add a few ifdef checks around some code requiring thread
libraries.)
I noticed that nsadmin from the disabled threads build would fail with a
BAD PARAM message when interacting with the nsd from the threaded
Hi Rob,
is it possible for you to duplicate the issue on MICO HEAD while using
multi-threading IRd and single-threaded MICO ORB for Combat? Basically
speaking you will need to do two builds in independent directories, but
there is quite a load of changes done since 2011 so it's most important
Hi Karel,
The version of MICO I am working with is from December 2, 2011. I tried
the most recent version from darcs, but I cannot load IDL into the
Interface Repository without an error if it is not compiled with thread
support. (With threading support enabled, it works fine, but I haven't
teste
Hi Rob,
obvious question is what MICO exactly do you use, on which platform
(OS/compiler versions). By MICO version I mean either release number or
what is your last patch in darcs repo if you use repo.
Thanks,
Karel
On 11/27/15 07:56 PM, Rob Ratcliff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've noticed recently t
Hi,
We've noticed recently that calls to _non_existent() are coming back
true even when the remove object is active and the communication thread
on the remove is blocked for a period due to it being busy with tasking.
(We are currently running MICO single threaded currently due to using
Combat.) I
