Hi,
On 08/03/10 11:53, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Karel Gardas
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> there are two things to discuss here:
>>
>> 1) I don't understand why using gendef makes maintenance of your Jamfile
>> harder and preserve a needs for manual patching o
Hi,
there are two things to discuss here:
1) I don't understand why using gendef makes maintenance of your Jamfile
harder and preserve a needs for manual patching of it in the future
2) dllexport/dllimport support is interesting question. In the past I
was strongly against this. The reason was
Hi,
I'm writing a boost.build v2 Jamfile for building mico so that I integrate mico
better in my build system.
I'm hitting a problem that mico needs to run gendef to generate a .def file for
building mico as a DLL with msvc.
I would like to propose modifying mico and sending patches that allow bui
