rel-enclosure is deliberately limited, so that it can be used as part
of a wider format.
The issue of alternative representations seems like a common one for
media. At the HTML level rel=alternate is used for this.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#h-12.3
If you are listing
Great, David - I'll add mine.
On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:36 AM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
Strangely enough!:
http://microformats.org/wiki/alternates-brainstorming
http://microformats.org/wiki/alternates-examples
Regards, etc...
David
Kevin Marks wrote:
rel-enclosure is deliberately
No [1]. LINK and A only.
Regards, etc...
David
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/index/attributes.html
Enric wrote:
Can rel= be used on span ?
-- Enric
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Looks interesting:
http://xaddemo.joshpeek.com/
--
Chris Messina
FactoryCity Foreman
Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work / factorycity.net
Blog / factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell / 412 225-1051
Skype / factoryjoe
This email is: [ ] bloggable[X] ask first [ ] private
At 15:36 -0400 31.05.2006, Christopher St John wrote:
as a target date how's the middle of next week? Maybe:
Wed, May 3rd
That should, of course, be:
Wed, June 7, 2006
Many apologies - in the midst of a work crisis, I got behind on
reading this list, and missed this.
I would still be
Looks like no, although this appears to be an omission in the spec.
Anyone have any ideas from the WWW-HTML list?
--
Ryan Cannon
Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com
On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:59 AM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix
I'm curious what the status of the citation microformat is now - I've
seen some changes in the wiki pages, but can't really tell who's
working on it or what level of consensus it has reached.
I'm interested because I have some flights coming up on which I might
try playing with BibDesk's new
On Jun 13, 2006, at 3:11 AM, Ryan King wrote:
On Jun 11, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 6/11/06 6:11 PM, Steve Ganz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the hResume draft, it is written:
Schema:
* contact info. required. address + hCard.
How about:
* contact info.
