Charles,
Funny, I've been planning to write a blog post entitled something like
What's the one thing wrong with Open-Source? Forking! :)
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
Iliya Krempeaux
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:45
Is it good for the interpretation of the data on one page to rely on data
on another page? anyone has an opinion?
My knee-jerk reaction is that it is very bad practice to have what would
essentially be the legend to be on a separate page. Very, very bad. When
I use to teach programming, one of
Because it hasn't gone through the (fairly rigorous) demands of the uF
process -- the process page on the wiki[1] outlines this.
But what I'm hearing is that if it's not visible it cannot go through that
process...
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Yes I was joking, but in the sense of Many a truth said in jest. In my 20+
years in the tech industry I don't think I've a group of people who can be
more religious than those discussing technical matters, excepting
fundamentalists in any real religion. :)
And because religions tend to promote
that is *only* for machine consumption
Conversely, if he's unsure whether the metadata *has* to be invisible,
then perhaps this is still a worthwhile discussion.
For clarity, there is nothing that says that the metadata I was proposing
and am additionally envisioning couldn't be visible. It
My suggestion to use invisible data formats was prefaced with the
scenario that your data is invisible, based on the subject of this thread.
The above criteria seem to contradict the subject of this thread.
If that is the case, I apologize. I envision several different needs
although not all
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I don't know how / where to submit it for potential consideration as a
microformat
Read the process. Then read it again, and again until you fully
understand it, and then follow it.
http://microformats.org/wiki/process
You really need to start by documenting real
This is something I just now realized, and while all excited, I
thought I'd send to the list:
When using HTML lists (ul/ol) for representing operand argument lists,
it appears very logical to identify the distinction between ordered
and unordered as that of and and or, respectively.
In other
Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
When using HTML lists (ul/ol) for representing operand argument lists,
it appears very logical to identify the distinction between ordered
and unordered as that of and and or, respectively.
ol
Can mean this and that. While,
ul
infers this or that.
I really don't
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has a working drafts or specs for a
microformat for presenting document revision history. I don't want to
reinvent any wheels -square, round or otherwise funny shaped - if I
can help it. :)
The reason I ask is that I've been looking at the Microsoft Simple
Hi MIke,
I think we may the victim of a major miscommunication, aggravated by
the choice of subject. Let me start over, to see if I understand.
resolve this one specific use case.) Consider these three URLs:
http://www.foo.com/toyota/4runner/1999/
11 matches
Mail list logo
