On 1/23/07, Dimitrios Zachariadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
I was wondering if there is any reason to avoid using
the hCalendar dtstamp property inside a geo
microtag.
--- depends. I'm not sure what you are trying to do? There is also a
REV property in vCard and a LAST-MODIFIED in
Brian,
thank you very much for your reply.
--- i think you need to ask, is the currently being
published in this
way, and does it need to be examined to find the
current publishing habits?
You are right. The question is is the current
publishing method adequate for getting an one click
map
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
This is a very, very common mistake. So common, in fact, that the
current HTML5 draft drops @rev. In the interest of keeping vote-links
future compatible, we should rely on using both rel and rev. See the
rel-faq
on Jan 22, 2007, at 2:21 AM, David Janes wrote:
Last week in Boston we were discussing Pingerati and how do you find
microformats (in general). One passing idea I had was that search
engines should supply a CSS element selector. So for example, to find
Tantek's hCard we could search tantek
Continuing the tradition of riffing off other threads to talk about
what's on my mind...
On 1/23/07, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a full CSS selector based search engine, but http://
kitchen.technorati.com/contacts/search/tantek.
Wouldn't it be great if there was a well
I disagree.
First of all, you don't need both @rel and @rev for votelinks. Right
now you just need @rev to declare votes. Linking in the opposite
direction doesn't add anything, as it is a 3rd party assertion (or
hearsay).
Secondly, if people can't figure out how to use it properly, they'll
use
On Jan 23, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
I disagree.
First of all, you don't need both @rel and @rev for votelinks. Right
now you just need @rev to declare votes. Linking in the opposite
direction doesn't add anything, as it is a 3rd party assertion (or
hearsay).
Secondly, if
I understand that the attributes, as defined specify the direction of
the relationship. However, it has been found in practice that people
confuse these and misuse the two attributes. So, that ambiguity is
already there in practice, but not reflected in the specification.
HTML5 is a step towards
On 1/23/07 10:22 AM, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuing the tradition of riffing off other threads to talk about
what's on my mind...
On 1/23/07, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a full CSS selector based search engine, but http://
On 1/23/07 12:15 PM, Ara Pehlivanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't call people 'thick' just because they don't understand the
difference between @rev and @rel. I've seen numerous people (myself
included) mistake the two. Hey Tantek, why don't you tell everyone
the story about how you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben
Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there no interrest in such a microformat like rel=pavatar?
It's been listed as a rejected microformat:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats
though I can find no such rejection, by this
On 1/23/07 1:05 PM, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/23/07, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Janes, you're right, we need to solve this problem.
I did some research on examples in the wild and possible approaches here:
I have received a series of helpful comments on the Geo-extension
proposal:
http://microformats.org/wiki/geo-extension-strawman
from Brent A. Archinal, Geodesist with the Astrogeology Team of the U.S.
Geological Survey
With his permission, I've added them to the above page.
I've also
Ara, the point is that with rel/rev in particular, it has confused *even the
people that are supposed to be experts*. As Ryan points out, I myself got
it wrong when I initially proposed to Kevin Marks that we use 'rel' for
VoteLinks instead of their initial idea of using a new HTML attribute
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
It's been listed as a rejected microformat:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats
though I can find no such rejection, by this community. Perhaps
someone
can give a reference?
On Dec 28, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Document Examples in the Wild first of people linking to their and
others'
hCards, and that will drive the scope of the solution.
Does this need to be limited to hCard? I think identifying pointers
to a canonical source of data is a
On 1/23/07 3:51 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Document Examples in the Wild first of people linking to their and
others'
hCards, and that will drive the scope of the solution.
Does this need to be limited to hCard?
It doesn't
On 1/23/07 4:12 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
It's been listed as a rejected microformat:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats
though I can find no such rejection, by this community. Perhaps
someone
can give
18 matches
Mail list logo
