excerpted from http://microformats.org/wiki/hAtom#Entry_Content :
an Entry MAY have 0 or more Entry Content elements. The "logical Entry Content"
of an Entry is the
concatenation, in order of appearance, of all the Entry Contents within the
Entry
Many weblogs split content into multiple secti
On 5/23/07, Andrew Jaswa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been looking at microformats for a few weeks now and I'm slightly
confused with the proposed hResume format.
My confusion comes from the employment history.
Why would one want to put a personal hCard into an hCalendar event
that essential
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kalisti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>The issue I'm having right now is finding a balance between keeping my
>site optimized for human reading, and also making it as semantically
>robust as possible for machines. The specific issue is that since every
>business on the
Hello,
If the term "Microformat" does become a synonym for Semantic HTML
(with most people outside this group... and yeah, I've noticed to that
it looks like it already has)... I suppose we could start using the
terminology...
"Official Microformat" and "Unofficial Microformat"
Or something lik
Hello,
Here's a good use can for hAtom or maybe a (non-existent) hSummary
Microformat. (The forwarded message, that shows the use case, is
after my writing.)
A user is able to code their blog/vlog posts in HTML.
They are NOT able to touch the RSS feed directly.
They can get things into the RS
I've been looking at microformats for a few weeks now and I'm slightly
confused with the proposed hResume format.
My confusion comes from the employment history.
Why would one want to put a personal hCard into an hCalendar event
that essentially has old information in it? A person who is viewing
Obviously I could just include the information, even though it serves no
function for the human readers of the site. But I am reluctant to add
redundant >information that serves no function to human readers -- part
of the draw of u-formats for me is the ability to have added semantic
informa
On May 22, 2007, at 11:35 PM, Ciaran McNulty wrote:
On 5/23/07, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I find it questionable to argue that microformats.org defining
semantics for particular classes is generally good, but to assume
that W3C or WHATWG defining them is ill-conceived. Note
