From: Katrina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The quote from RFC 2426 refers to 'the' locality and 'the' extended
> address, which to me, sounds like exactly one.
>
> Is it legitimate to have multiple localities or extended addresses?
My bad there, sorry for the confusion Katrina.
All properties are sin
The properties for adr come directly from RFC 2426
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2426.txt
Here is what RFC 2426 has to say on the matter.
The structured type value corresponds,
in sequence, to the post office box; the extended address; the street
address; the locality (e.g., city); the
From: James Howison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 12:30 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> > It doesn't. locality equates to city. this has been true in common
> > vCard
> > implementations for many years.
>
> Doesn't that depend on the local meaning of City vs Suburb? ie I think
> Suburb m
Thank you!
On 7-Nov-07, at 3:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Francois Lafortune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I will do my studies! But my emotional beef is more about seeing divs
pop-up like it's a division party, and that sorta gets me roughed
up...
The divs and spans that you're worried about
On Nov 7, 2007, at 12:30 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 11/6/07 7:20 PM, "Katrina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gday,
I would like to ask a few questions about the adr microformat and I
really hope I am in the correct place. I am so sorry if I am not.
I am trying to learn about microformats, and
From: Francois Lafortune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I will do my studies! But my emotional beef is more about seeing divs
> pop-up like it's a division party, and that sorta gets me roughed
> up...
The divs and spans that you're worried about aren't mandetory, they're just
there to help describe the
